Western District of Kentucky • 3:26-cv-00583

#1

Jul 31, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AKYWDC-4607886.), filed by Hung Nguyen. (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit ICE Detainee Locator Printout, # 3 Exhibit Oldham County Detention Center Inmate Printout, # 4 Exhibit EOIR Automated Case Information) (DJT) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

#2

Jul 31, 2026

Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (DJT) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

#3

Jul 31, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Johnson on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olson, David Venturella (Johnson, Bradley) (Entered: 07/31/2026)

Jul 31, 2026

Remark (Public)

Jul 31, 2026

REMARK: Electronic notification of the petition and any subsequent order constitutes valid service on all federal respondents named therein as of the date of this remark pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which the Court is applying to these cases. (DJT)

#4

Aug 03, 2026

TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge King for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge King may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, LLK-CM (HMC) (Entered: 08/03/2026)

Aug 03, 2026

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

#5

Aug 07, 2026

TEXT ORDER: In response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 8/11/26, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Respondents should address the Petitioner's contentions that immigration officials unlawfully revoked his order of supervision. See 8 C.F.R. 241.4(l) & 241.13(i); Cardona Meza v. Woosley, et al., No. 4:26-cv-148-BJB, DN 16 (W.D. Ky.). And if the Government is detaining the Petitioner to execute a removal order, it must respond with the status of those efforts and indicate whether removal is "reasonably foreseeable." Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 (2001). Unless the parties file notice that they seek a hearing, the Court will presume that the petition presents no material factual disputes and decide it on the papers. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/26 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. cc: Counsel, Respondent Jeff Tindall (via Certified mail) w/ DN 1 Petition (JM) (Entered: 08/07/2026)

#6

Aug 07, 2026

Notice (Other)

Aug 07, 2026

Order - TEXT ONLY

#7

Aug 11, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

#8

Aug 14, 2026

Notice (Other)

#9

Aug 22, 2026

Reply