Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-04817

#1

Jul 28, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-22378608), filed by Kevin Javier Reyes Aldana. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Cover Letter, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)(Lazo, Margie) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

#2

Jul 28, 2026

ORDER FOR SERVICE -- Upon review, it is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing (NEF) of the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents, as required by the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5, and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is further ORDERED that Respondents must file a response to the Petition (Dkt. No. 1) within 7 days of electronic service. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (cih) (Entered: 07/28/2026)

Jul 28, 2026

Case assigned to Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cih)

Jul 28, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (cih)

Jul 28, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

Jul 28, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

#3

Jul 29, 2026

Order

#4

Aug 04, 2026

Response

#5

Aug 18, 2026

Response

#6

Sep 14, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#7

Sep 28, 2026

Status Report

#8

Sep 30, 2026

Enforce Judgment

#9

Oct 07, 2026

Response

#10

Oct 15, 2026

Supplement to

Oct 20, 2026

Order on Motion to Enforce Judgment

Oct 20, 2026

Text Order DENYING 8 Motion to Enforce Judgment. The Court ordered that Petitioner be given a bond hearing, and Petitioner received one. Under the INA, the Court lacks jurisdiction to review an immigration judge's denial of bond following the custody redetermination hearing to which those detained under Section 1226(a) are entitled. Although Petitioner, as an applicant for admission mandatorily detained under Section 1225(b), was not entitled under the INA to such a bond hearing, the Court determined that he was still entitled to as much process as those detained under Section 1226(a), albeit on due process grounds. The Court cannot conclude, however, that an applicant for admission is entitled to even greater process with respect to custody redeterminations than those who are statutorily entitled to such redeterminations. Entered by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ROlc)