Active
Case Information
Filed: July 23, 2026
Assigned to:
Benjamin Beaton
Referred to:
Henry Brent Brennenstuhl
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:1441 Petition for Removal
Active
Last Activity:
August 27, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 23, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number BKYWDC-4601096) filed by Angel Castaneda Albiter. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - ICE Detainee Locator, # 2 Exhibit B - Daviess County Jail Inmates, # 3 Exhibit C - EOIR Automated Case Info, # 4 Exhibit D - Certified Court Disposition of Dismissal, # 5 Cover Sheet) (MNM) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 24, 2026
Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (MNM) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Main Document:
Case Assignment
#3
Jul 24, 2026
NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Johnson on behalf of Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Samuel Olsen (Johnson, Bradley) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
Jul 24, 2026
Remark (Public)
Jul 24, 2026
REMARK: Electronic notification of the petition and any subsequent order constitutes valid service on all federal respondents named therein as of the date of this remark pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which the Court is applying to these cases. (MNM)
#4
Jul 28, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), the Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Brennenstuhl for hearing and determining all pretrial matters, including non-dispositive motions. Judge Brennenstuhl may conduct a settlement conference in this matter at any time. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, HBB-CM (HMC) (Entered: 07/28/2026)
Jul 28, 2026
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
#5
Aug 07, 2026
TEXT ORDER: In response to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 8/11/26, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Respondents should address whether, considering the allegations in the petition, Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 175 F.4th 713 (6th Cir. 2026), controls the outcome. Unless the parties file notice that they seek a hearing, the Court will presume that the petition presents no material factual disputes and decide it on the papers. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/26 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, Respondents (as directed) (HMC) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
#6
Aug 07, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document:
Notice (Other)
Aug 07, 2026
Order - TEXT ONLY
#7
Aug 11, 2026
Response to Order to Show Cause
Main Document:
Response to Order to Show Cause
#8
Aug 13, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document:
Notice (Other)
#9
Aug 27, 2026
Notice (Other)
Main Document:
Notice (Other)
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
Firm