Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05704

#1

Jul 22, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Orestes Cruz, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella, Warden Center Valley Annex by Roman Kachmar. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13621447) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet civil coversheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit)(Bautista, Cynthia) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

#2

Jul 22, 2026

PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Roman Kachmar for attorney Margie S. Lazo 459 Broadway, Suite 300 to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 300, receipt number ACAEDC-13621520) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit certificate of good standing) (Bautista, Cynthia) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

#3

Jul 22, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

#4

Jul 22, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Todd Blanche,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Orestes Cruz,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin,Elisa M. Rodriguez for David J. Venturella,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Warden of the Central Valley Annex Facility (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 07/22/2026)

#5

Jul 23, 2026

PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/22/2026 GRANTING 2 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Margie S. Lazo, PHV for Roman Kachmar. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Deputy Clerk OML) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

#6

Jul 23, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/23/2026: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ). On review the issues raised in Count 1 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See M.B. v. Noem, 1:26-cv-00005-DJC-AC; see also Oli v. Andrews, No. 1:26-cv-00477-DJC-AC. Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before July 28, 2026, as to why the Court should not grant a writ of habeas corpus as to Count 1 by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2243. In such a return, Respondents should identify any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before July 29, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

Jul 23, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings