Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05634
(HC) Guerrero-Pino v. Warden, Central Valley Annex
Completed
Case Information
Filed: July 20, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: September 01, 2026
Last Activity:
September 01, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 20, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex by Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 20, 2026
MOTION to EXPEDITE by Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
#3
Jul 20, 2026
MOTION to PROHIBIT TRANSFER by Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
Miscellaneous Relief
Jul 21, 2026
RECEIPT number 100008909 for $5.00 from Onelbis Pino. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
#4
Jul 22, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk DAR) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#5
Jul 22, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Warden, Central Valley Annex (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/22/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Jul 22, 2026
Service by Mail
Jul 22, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Immigration New Case Documents served on Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
#6
Jul 24, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/24/2026. Petitioner, a self-represented immigration detainee, filed a 1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and paid the filing fee. Petitioner also filed motions to prohibit transfer 3 and to expedite 2, seeking expedited consideration of the petition, expedited briefing schedule, and other relief deemed just and proper. Because the court, in the matter of course, issues a shortened briefing schedule with a no transfer order (see below), petitioner's motions [2, 3] are denied as unnecessary. To the extent petitioner seeks temporary injunctive relief pending resolution of this petition, he may file a motion identifying the temporary injunctive relief sought and the basis for such relief. Otherwise, the court will rule on the petition in due course and sets the following briefing schedule. Respondents are directed to file a response within 7 days from the date of this order, which shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders in Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-1755 DAD AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-1566 DAD AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Mejia Parada v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-1564 DAD JDP, 2026 WL 555479 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. The response shall include petitioner's Form I-213 for each immigration encounter, any orders of release or detention, any custody warrants, notices, or decisions, and if respondents dispute any factual representations in the operative petition, any and all documents necessary to support their view of the facts. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due within 7 days of being served a copy of the respondents' response. Respondents shall NOT TRANSFER petitioner outside of this judicial district, pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which empowers the federal courts to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions...."); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that federal courts have the power to "to preserve the court's jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an agency's action"). (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JAA) (Entered: 07/24/2026)
Jul 24, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
Jul 24, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Minute Order served on Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk JAA)
Jul 24, 2026
Service by Mail
#7
Jul 31, 2026
MOTION for 4-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to Respond to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden, Central Valley Annex. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/31/2026)
Main Document:
Extension of Time
#8
Aug 03, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/03/2026. Good cause appearing, respondent's motion for a four-day extension of time 7 is GRANTED. Respondent shall file a response to the petition no later than August 5, 2026. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JAA) (Entered: 08/03/2026)
Aug 03, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Minute Order served on Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk JAA)
Aug 03, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 03, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Extension of Time
#9
Aug 05, 2026
ANSWER (Reply) to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Warden, Central Valley Annex. (Rodriguez, Elisa) Modified on 8/11/2026 (KS). (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document:
ANSWER
#10
Aug 17, 2026
MOTION to ACCEPT LATE FILING re Reply by Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Extension of Time
#11
Aug 17, 2026
TRAVERSE by Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk LMS) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
Traverse
#12
Aug 27, 2026
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/27/2027 DENYING 10 Motion to Accept Late Filing. It is further RECOMMENDED that the the 1 Petition be granted and Respondent be ordered to immediately release petitioner from custody. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections due within 3 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Deputy Clerk VLK) (Entered: 08/27/2026)
Aug 27, 2026
Service by Mail
Aug 27, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 12 Order served on Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk VLK)
#13
Aug 28, 2026
OBJECTIONS to 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Respondent Warden, Central Valley Annex. (Rodriguez, Elisa) Modified on 9/1/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 08/28/2026)
Main Document:
Objections to Findings and Recommendations
#14
Sep 01, 2026
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/1/26 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as follows: Respondent is ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE petitioner Onelbis Guerrero-Pino, A-File No. 246-014-174, from respondent's custody under the same conditions, if any, he was subject to prior to his re-detention on or about 6/2/26; Respondent is ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from re-detaining petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without providing petitioner notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge; and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of petitioner and to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (cc Central Valley Annex) (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
#15
Sep 01, 2026
JUDGMENT dated *9/1/26* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/1/26 in favor of Petitioner against Respondent. (Deputy Clerk JAW) (Entered: 09/01/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment
Sep 01, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 15 Judgment, 14 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Onelbis Guerrero-Pino. (Deputy Clerk JAW)
Sep 01, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Guerrero-Pino
Party
Warden, Central Valley Annex
Party