Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05527
(HC) Mendez Yanza v. Warden, California City Correctional Center
Completed
Case Information
Filed: July 17, 2026
Assigned to:
Dale Alan Drozd
Referred to:
Jeremy D. Peterson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: August 03, 2026
Last Activity:
August 03, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 17, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Wilson Fabian Mendez Yanza. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 07/20/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 17, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Wilson Fabian Mendez Yanza. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 07/20/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Jul 20, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 07/20/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Jul 20, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden, California City Correctional Center (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 07/20/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Jul 20, 2026
MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/20/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance if they have not already done so. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, 7/21/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondents oppose this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondents are DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in their opposition. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 07/20/2026)
Jul 20, 2026
Service by Mail
Jul 20, 2026
Minute Order
Jul 20, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Wilson Fabian Mendez Yanza. (Deputy Clerk PAB)
Jul 20, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Wilson Fabian Mendez Yanza. (Deputy Clerk AKP)
#7
Aug 03, 2026
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/31/2026 GRANTING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as follows: Respondent is ORDERED to IMMEDIATELY RELEASE Petitioner, William Fabian Mendez Yanza, A # 222-593-003, from Respondent 9;s custody, Respondent is ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining Petitioner for any purpose, absent exigent circumstances, without providing Petitioner notice and a pre-detention hearing before an immigration judge, at which hearing the burden wi ll be set in accordance with U.S.C. §1226(a) and its implementing regulations. 2 Motion for TRO is DENIED as having been rendered moot by this order. The Clerk is directed to serve the Warden of the California City Correctional Center with a copy of this order and enter judgment in favor of Petitioner. CASE CLOSED. (cc Cal City) (Deputy Clerk KML)
#8
Aug 03, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Aug 03, 2026
Service by Mail
Parties
(HC) Mendez Yanza
Party
Warden, California City Correctional Center
Party