Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01728

#1

Dec 03, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Pamela Bondi, Marcos Charles, DOE 1, Todd M Lyons, Kristi Noem by Arman Nersisyan. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12642640) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 8, # 7 Exhibit 9, # 8 Exhibit 10, # 9 Exhibit 11)(Ridgill, Steven) (Entered: 12/03/2025)

#2

Dec 03, 2025

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Arman Nersisyan. (Ridgill, Steven) (Entered: 12/03/2025)

#3

Dec 04, 2025

ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Deputy Clerk OFR) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

#4

Dec 05, 2025

06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response

#5

Dec 05, 2025

DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on United States Attorney. (Deputy Clerk EF) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

#6

Dec 08, 2025

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney David W. Spencer, GOVT for Pamela Bondi,David W. Spencer, GOVT for Marcos Charles,David W. Spencer, GOVT for Todd M. Lyons,David W. Spencer, GOVT for Kristi Noem,David W. Spencer, GOVT for Warden of California City Corrections Center (Spencer, David) (Entered: 12/08/2025)

#7

Dec 08, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Spencer, David) (Entered: 12/08/2025)

#8

Jan 05, 2026

Dismiss

#9

Jan 21, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#10

Feb 02, 2026

Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#11

Feb 02, 2026

SUBSTITUTION of ATTORNEY - PROPOSED, submitted by Arman Nersisyan. (Mc Clure, Stephanie) (Entered: 02/02/2026)

#12

Feb 04, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#13

Feb 04, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has reviewed the Petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) and the related request for emergency injunctive relief (Doc. 12). Petitioner asserts that he has been detained since October 30, 2025. Despite that his detention began more than 3 months ago and that his petition was filed 2 months ago, he fails to explain his delay in seeking his request for a temporary restraining order or why this delay should cause this Court to treat the situation as an emergency. Thus, the TRO request is untimely, and it is DENIED. Local Rule 231(b) signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on February 4, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 02/04/2026)

#14

Feb 04, 2026

Substitution of Attorney Order

Feb 04, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#15

Feb 11, 2026

Amend the Complaint/Petition

#16

Feb 11, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#17

Feb 12, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has read and considered Petitioner's second request for temporary restraining order (Doc. 16 ) filed as a result of the Court denying the nearly identical request just days ago. If petitioner is seeking reconsideration, he has failed to meet the standard for reconsideration. As a new filing for the same relief, he fails to identify the procedural basis for such a repeat filing. In any event, counsel fails to appreciate that the Court's order addresses only whether Petitioner's detention status should be addressed on shortened time (i.e., as a procedural emergency), and he makes no showing that counsel's failure to act timely addresses the central issue of the Court's minute order. Eastern District of California Local Rule 231(b) permits the Court to consider "whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Nothing in the current filing causes the Court to question its prior determination that the issues raised here--no matter their merit--could have been brought earlier by way of a regularly scheduled motion. The evidence of harm cited by counsel is identified by every petitioner who has sought immigration-related habeas relief from this Court--at the rate of nearly 200 per week. Petitioner's request is, in effect, an attempt to jump the line ahead of similarly situated individuals who timely filed their actions. For these reasons, the new request for a temporary restraining order (Doc 16) is DENIED. The motion to amend the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 15) is referred to the assigned magistrate judge and the hearing unilaterally set by counsel on February 13, 2026, is VACATED signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on February 12, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

#18

Feb 12, 2026

Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Feb 12, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#19

Feb 19, 2026

Statement of Non-Opposition

#20

Feb 20, 2026

06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response AND Order on Motion to Amend the Complaint AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#21

Mar 03, 2026

AMENDED DOCUMENT by Arman Nersisyan: Amended 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 20 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,, Order on Motion to Amend the Complaint,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Parole Card - Release)(Mc Clure, Stephanie) (Entered: 03/03/2026)

#22

Mar 13, 2026

Dismiss

#23

Mar 23, 2026

Opposition to Motion

#24

Apr 13, 2026

Findings and Recommendations

#25

Apr 17, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order

#26

Apr 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Entry Only) The Court has read and considered Petitioner's third request for temporary restraining order (Doc. 25). In this TRO, he seeks to obtain his release from custody based upon the recommendation of the magistrate judge, who has concluded that release is the appropriate remedy (Doc. 24). However, because this Court must consider any objections to the findings and recommendations to determine whether it will adopt the recommendations, Petitioner fails to offer any legal basis to justify the Court ignoring this required process. Once again, the Court does not discount the Petitioner's desire for release. As previously noted, however, the evidence of harm cited by counsel is identified by every petitioner who has sought immigration-related habeas relief from this Court--at the rate of nearly 200 per week. Petitioner's third request is yet another an attempt to jump the line ahead of similarly situated individuals who timely filed their actions. The time the Court must take to address these baseless requests is time that could be used addressing the merits of another person's claim. Counsel SHALL NOT file another frivolous motion, or the Court will impose sanctions. The third request for a temporary restraining order (Doc 25) is DENIED signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on April 20, 2026. (Deputy Clerk IM) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

Apr 20, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#27

Apr 27, 2026

Objections to Findings and Recommendations

#28

Apr 29, 2026

Findings and Recommendations AND Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND Order on Motion to Dismiss AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case