Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05489

#1

Jul 16, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Tonya Andrews, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David J. Venturella by Jaskaranjeet Singh. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13593173) (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#2

Jul 16, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jaskaranjeet Singh. (Attachments: # 1 Notice, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#3

Jul 16, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk RMG) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#4

Jul 16, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Anthony Andrews for Tonya Andrews,Anthony Andrews for Todd Blanche,Anthony Andrews for Markwayne Mullin,Anthony Andrews for David J. Venturella (Andrews, Anthony) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#5

Jul 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 7/16/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 1 petition. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before July 20, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Entered: 07/16/2026)

Jul 16, 2026

Minute Order

#6

Jul 20, 2026

Dismiss

#7

Jul 20, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 7/20/2026: Petitioner may file an opposition to the 6 motion to dismiss by July 28, 2026. (Entered: 07/20/2026)

Jul 20, 2026

Minute Order

#8

Jul 21, 2026

REPLY by Jaskaranjeet Singh re 7 Minute Order, 6 Motion to Dismiss. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Gurpreet Kaur, # 2 Declaration Petitioner Jaskaranjeet Singh)(Kaur, Gurpreet) (Entered: 07/21/2026)

#9

Jul 25, 2026

Order on Motion to Dismiss

#12

Jul 30, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#13

Jul 30, 2026

Judgment