Southern District of California • 3:26-cv-04026

#1

Jul 13, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Christopher LaRose ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 170794.), filed by Ntangku Desmond Akuoh. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibits, # 3 Receipt, # 4 Envelope)The new case number is 3:26-cv-4026-JLS-SBC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case. (Desmond Akuoh Ntangku)(ddo) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/14/2026) (ddo). (sjt). (Entered: 07/14/2026)

#2

Jul 15, 2026

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Christopher LaRose of case(s) No. 26-cv-2257-AGS-VET . (Dimbleby, Erin) (mef). (Entered: 07/15/2026)

#3

Jul 15, 2026

MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Janis L. Sammartino, Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres for all further proceedings. The new case number is 26-cv-04026-AGS-VET.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (rxc) (Entered: 07/15/2026)

Jul 15, 2026

Order of Judge Transfer

#4

Jul 16, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel by Camille Savedra on behalf of Christopher LaRose (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Savedra, Camille)Attorney Camille Savedra added to party Christopher LaRose(pty:res) (ggv). (Entered: 07/16/2026)

#5

Jul 17, 2026

ORDER (AGS): Petitioner has filed a successive § 2241 habeas petition challenging his immigration detention. See 26-cv-2257-AGS-VET. But it appears to be substantively identical to his recently denied petition, except for his complaints about the ruling in that case. (See ECF 1 .) So, by August 7, 2026, petitioner must show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed as duplicative. Should petitioner wish to appeal or request reconsideration of his original case, he should file, or direct his attorney in that case to file, the appropriate motion or notice of appeal. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 07/17/2026.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (mxa) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

Jul 17, 2026

Order

#6

Aug 03, 2026

Return to Why My Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Should Not Be Subjected to Dismissal re 5 Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-C)(ggv) (Entered: 08/04/2026)

#7

Aug 05, 2026

ORDER (AGS): Having reviewed petitioner's response to this Courts show cause order (ECF 6 ), the Court dismisses this case as duplicative. See 26-cv-2257-AGS-VET. Petitioner asserts the same arguments already rejected in his prior petition only two weeks before he filed this one. See Eldridge v. Howard, 70 F.4th 543, 551 (9th Cir. 2023) ("The abuse of the writ doctrine forbids the reconsideration of claims that were or could have been raised in a prior habeas petition."). The Clerk must issue a judgment and close this case. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 08/05/2026.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (mxa) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

#8

Aug 05, 2026

CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Having reviewed petitioner's response to this Courts show cause order (ECF 6), the Court dismisses this case as duplicative. See 26-cv-2257-AGS-VET. Petitioner asserts the same arguments already rejected in his prior petition only two weeks before he filed this one. See Eldridge v. Howard, 70 F.4th 543, 551 (9th Cir. 2023) ("The abuse of the writ doctrine forbids the reconsideration of claims that were or could have been raised in a prior habeas petition."). The case is hereby closed.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mef) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

Aug 05, 2026

Order