Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05340
(HC) Palacio Acosta v. Warden, California City Detention Facility
Completed
Case Information
Filed: July 10, 2026
Assigned to:
Rebecca L. Pennell
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Completed: July 28, 2026
Last Activity:
August 11, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 10, 2026
(2241) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Detention Facility by Luis Leonel Palacio Acosta. (RECEIPT #100008800 $5.00 paid on 07/13/2026 by Cal City Immigration Processing) (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 07/14/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 14, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk CM) (Entered: 07/14/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#3
Jul 14, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden, California City Detention Facility (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 07/14/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
Jul 14, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 2 Immigration New Case Documents served on Luis Leonel Palacio Acosta. (Deputy Clerk CM)
Jul 14, 2026
Service by Mail
#4
Jul 15, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by Visiting Judge Rebecca L Pennell on 7/15/2026: The Court has reviewed the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is reserved at this time. Respondents shall file any opposition to the Petition by July 20, 2026. Any response must include Petitioner's A-File 244475840, full and complete Form I-213, any orders of release or detention, any custody warrants or notices, and any other portions of Petitioner's A-File relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the Petition, including available documentation related to any asserted violations of release conditions. Failure to timely respond shall be construed as a non-opposition. See L.R. 230(c). Respondent is directed to indicate on or before the filing deadline (1) whether they are requesting a hearing, and (2) whether they request additional briefing on the merits of the petition. Depending on the content of the filings, the Court may set a hearing or may rule on the papers. In the meantime, pending a ruling on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Court orders that Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 608 (1966) (noting the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction."). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Deputy Clerk JJD) (Entered: 07/15/2026)
Jul 15, 2026
Service by Mail
Jul 15, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Minute Order served on Luis Leonel Palacio Acosta. (Deputy Clerk JJD)
Jul 15, 2026
Minute Order
#5
Jul 17, 2026
RESPONSE by Warden, California City Detention Facility to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 4 Minute Order,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 213, # 2 Exhibit RAP sheet, # 3 Proof of Service)(Davis, Sean) (Entered: 07/17/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#6
Jul 28, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
#7
Jul 28, 2026
Judgment
Main Document:
Judgment
Jul 28, 2026
Service by Mail
Jul 28, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Order and 7 Judgment served on Luis Leonel Palacio Acosta. (Deputy Clerk LLH)
#8
Aug 11, 2026
Notice of Compliance
Main Document:
Notice of Compliance
Parties
(HC) Palacio Acosta
Party
Warden, California City Detention Facility
Party