District of New Jersey • 3:26-cv-08557

#1

Jul 10, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17647376.), filed by ANGELO PABLO AYALO SEDANO. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit)(HYKEL CUDDY, RENEE) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#2

Jul 10, 2026

TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/10/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

#3

Jul 10, 2026

TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/10/2026. (jml, ) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

Jul 10, 2026

Notice of Judicial Preferences

Jul 10, 2026

Notice of Judicial Preferences. Click here for the Judge's Individual Procedure Requirements. (jml, )

Jul 10, 2026

Judge Robert Kirsch added. (jml, )

Jul 10, 2026

Add and Terminate Judges

Jul 10, 2026

Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order

#4

Jul 13, 2026

Order

#5

Jul 13, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

#6

Jul 14, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#7

Jul 14, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Jul 14, 2026

Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings

Jul 14, 2026

Set Deadlines as to 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrea C. Soto, Esq.. Motion set for 8/17/2026 before Judge Robert Kirsch. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jal, )

#8

Jul 16, 2026

Letter

#9

Jul 23, 2026

Letter

#10

Sep 23, 2026

NOTICE by ANGELO PABLO AYALO SEDANO of Supplemental Authority (HYKEL CUDDY, RENEE) (Entered: 09/23/2026)

#11

Sep 23, 2026

TEXT ORDER: The Court has considered Petitioner's habeas petition, the Government's letter answer informing the Court of Petitioner's recent conviction for driving while intoxicated, and Petitioner's letter reply briefs. (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 8 -1, 9-10.) On August 28, 2026, the Third Circuit held that noncitizens who entered the United States without admission or inspection and are later arrested in the interior of the country may not be detained without bond under Section 1225(b)(2), see Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, --- F.4th ---, ---, 2026 WL 2546223, at *2-10 (3d Cir. Aug. 28, 2026). It appears that Petitioner has not been provided a bond hearing because Respondents contend that his case is not covered by Buele Morocho. Nevertheless, this Court has held that noncitizens who were paroled or released following apprehension at or near the border are entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) following a subsequent arrest in the interior of the United States. See Correa v. Delaney Hall, No. 26-4876, 2026 WL 1803202, at *3 (D.N.J. Jun. 23, 2026). The Court makes no determination about whether Petitioner is a danger or a flight risk and finds that a bond hearing is the appropriate remedy considering Petitioner's conviction for driving while intoxicated. See Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 779 (2008) (recognizing that habeas corpus is "an adaptable remedy" that depends on the circumstances, and that "release need not be the exclusive remedy and is not the appropriate one in every case in which the writ is granted"); see also Buele Morocho (affirming release of petitioners unlawfully detained under § 1225(b)(2), where they were long-term residents of the United States and had no criminal history). It is, therefore, ORDERED that in accordance with 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), within seven (7) days of the date of entry of this Text Order, Respondents shall provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge who shall assess whether he presents a flight risk or a danger to the community, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(c)(8), (d)(1). It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's counsel shall have notice of the bond hearing, a reasonable opportunity to prepare, and be permitted to reschedule the hearing outside the seven-day period, if necessary, without seeking this Court's intervention. It is further ORDERED that within three (3) days of that bond hearing, Respondents shall file a written notice of the outcome of that hearing with this Court and request to close this matter. So Ordered by Judge Robert Kirsch on 09/23/2026. (pdm) (Entered: 09/23/2026)

Sep 23, 2026

Text Order

#12

Sep 30, 2026

Letter

#13

Sep 30, 2026

Order

#14

Oct 03, 2026

Response (NOT Motion)