Central District of California • 5:26-cv-03771

#1

Jul 08, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-42728974 for $5 filing fee, filed by PETITIONER JOEL CARRILLO FRANCO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Petitioner, # 2 Exhibit B - DHS Form I-213, # 3 Exhibit C - DHS Form I-862, # 4 Exhibit D - BIA Decision 08.18.2014, # 5 Exhibit E - BIA Decision 07.13.2017, # 6 Exhibit F - IJ Dismissal Order 10.21.2024, # 7 Exhibit G - CA DOJ Records) (Attorney Osvaldo Adrian Vargas added to party JOEL CARRILLO FRANCO(pty:pet))(Vargas, Osvaldo) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#2

Jul 08, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner JOEL CARRILLO FRANCO. (Vargas, Osvaldo) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#3

Jul 08, 2026

The Petitioner has voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jtil) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#4

Jul 08, 2026

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#5

Jul 08, 2026

Notice of General Order 26-05 and Briefing Schedule. (jtil) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#6

Jul 08, 2026

APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to Immediate Release from ICE Custody filed by PETITIONER Joel Carrillo Franco. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Counsel Regarding Notice, # 2 Proposed Order) (Vargas, Osvaldo) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

#7

Jul 08, 2026

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: Denying Petitioner's Application for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO Application") 6 . Pursuant to General Order No. 26-05, the Court has set an expedited briefing schedule for the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. It is not certain that the merits of the TRO Application can be decided before the merits of the habeas petition. Even if there is a delay that results from awarding relief to Petitioner on the merits of the petition, it would be brief. Accordingly, the Court concludes that awarding relief via a TRO is not warranted. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). For these reasons, the TRO Application is DENIED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (RAO) (Entered: 07/08/2026)

Jul 08, 2026

2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination

Jul 08, 2026

Temporary Restraining Order