Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05220
(HC) Herrera Arzate v. Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Active
Case Information
Filed: July 06, 2026
Assigned to:
—
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
—
Active
Last Activity:
July 08, 2026
Docket Entries
#6
Jul 08, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 07/08/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#7
Jul 08, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/8/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 3 ). Liberally construed, the issues raised in the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 3 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before July 14, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 07/08/2026)
Jul 08, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Francisco Herrera Arzate. (Deputy Clerk GJM)
Jul 08, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Francisco Herrera Arzate. (Deputy Clerk DAR)
Jul 08, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Jul 08, 2026
Service by Mail