Eastern District of New York • 1:26-cv-04028

#1

Jul 06, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANYEDC-20395127, filed by Freddy Raul Alvarado Quezada. (Levine, Jesse) (SDM). (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#2

Jul 06, 2026

Civil Cover Sheet.. by Freddy Raul Alvarado Quezada (Levine, Jesse) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#3

Jul 06, 2026

This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SDM) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#4

Jul 06, 2026

SCHEDULING ORDER In order to preserve the Courts jurisdiction pending final disposition of the Petition, respondents are ENJOINED from moving petitioner to a location outside the Eastern District of New York, the Southern District of New York, or the District of New Jersey absent further order of this Court. Respondents shall submit a letter, by Tuesday, July 7, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., stating (1) whether they continue to hold petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A), as was argued in petitioners prior habeas case, see Alvarado Quezada v. Ladeon Francis, 26 Civ. 387 (S.D.N.Y., February 11, 2026), ECF No. 8, and (2) whether the Second Circuits decision in Barbosa Da Cunha v. Freden, No. 25-3141 (2d Cir. Apr. 28, 2026) controls, or whether otherwise there is any material basis to distinguish the instant case from this Courts prior decisions in Y- C- v. Genalo, No. 25-cv-06558, 2025 WL 3653496 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 17, 2025), Crespo Tacuri v. Genalo, No. 25-cv-06896, 2026 WL 35569 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2026), Terrero v. Tsoukaris, No. 26-cv-00869, 2026 WL 607917 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2026), Meza v. Francis, No. 26-cv-02722, 2026 WL 1734903 (E.D.N.Y. June 16, 2026), or any other decision of this Court. If respondents take the position that the present case is controlled by Barbosa Da Cunha and/or is not materially different from one or more of the Courts prior decisions, respondents shall further state whether respondents consent to the issuance of the writ, and petitioner's immediate release, subject to preservation of respondents arguments for appeal. If respondents take the position that the present case is not controlled by Barbosa Da Cunha or any of the Courts prior decisions, respondents are ordered to show cause, in writing, as to why the relief sought in the Petition should not be granted and otherwise respond to the factual and legal assertions in the Petition no later than Thursday, July 9, 2026. If respondents file a response to the Order to Show Cause, petitioner shall file a reply no later than 12:00 p.m. on Monday, July 13, 2026. If respondents file a response to the Order to Show Cause, the parties shall appear for a hearing and oral argument on the petition on Tuesday, July 14, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. before the Hon. Natasha C. Merle. The hearing will proceed by telephone. The parties are directed to call (571) 353-2301 five minutes before the scheduled start of the conference and use meeting ID 913 134 947. Petitioner shall serve respondents with a copy of the petition, along with a copy of this Order, by overnight mail today, Monday, July 6, 2026, and promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter a notice of appearance. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to deliver a copy of this Order and the Petition to the U.S. Attorneys Office at Richard.Hayes@usdoj.gov. ORDER ATTACHED. Ordered by Judge Natasha C. Merle on 7/6/2026. (SNK) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#5

Jul 06, 2026

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Freddy Raul Alvarado Quezada (Levine, Jesse) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

Jul 06, 2026

Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: No summons provided, please submit summons. The event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (SDM)

Jul 06, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Jul 06, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Natasha C. Merle. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SDM)

Jul 06, 2026

Quality Control Check - Summons

#6

Jul 07, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

#7

Jul 08, 2026

1 - Terminate Hearings AND Memorandum & Opinion AND ~Util - Email - to be used ONLY in conjunction with other selection

#8

Jul 08, 2026

Status Report

#9

Jul 08, 2026

Judgment - Clerk