Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05181

#1

Jul 06, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement, Warden of Golden State Annex Detention Facility by Devinder Singh Sidhu. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13546191) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proof of Service)(Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#2

Jul 06, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Devinder Singh Sidhu. (Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#3

Jul 06, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#4

Jul 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/6/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in Count 1 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before July 10, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before July 13, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

Jul 06, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings