Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05169
(HC)Ramirez Garcia v. Blanche
Active
Case Information
Filed: July 06, 2026
Assigned to:
Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to:
Chi Soo Kim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
July 06, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 06, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Moises Becerra, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Markwayne Mullin by Juan Ramirez Garcia. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13544189) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit List, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Mackins, Mackenzie) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jul 06, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Juan Ramirez Garcia. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)(Mackins, Mackenzie) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
CIVIL
#3
Jul 06, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk RMG) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Jul 06, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Moises Becerra,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Todd Blanche,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Christopher Chestnut,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Jul 06, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/6/2026: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ). On review the issues raised in Counts 1 and 2 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Morillo v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01533-DJC-AC; see also E.L.D.M. v Becerra, No. 1:25-cv-01906-DJC-JDP. Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before July 9, 2026, as to why the Court should not grant a writ of habeas corpus as to Counts 1 and 2 by filing a return as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 2243. In such a return, Respondents should identify any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before July 10, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Jul 06, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
Blanche
Party
(HC)Ramirez Garcia
Party