Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05120
(HC) Kaur v. Warden of California City Immigration Processing Center
Active
Case Information
Filed: July 03, 2026
Assigned to:
Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to:
Sean C. Riordan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Active
Last Activity:
July 06, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 03, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Todd Blanche, California City Immigration Processing Center, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement by Sarabjeet Kaur. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13539741) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet CCS, # 2 Proof of Service)(Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 07/03/2026)
Main Document:
PETITION
#2
Jul 03, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Sarabjeet Kaur. (Mann, Kamal) (Entered: 07/03/2026)
Main Document:
MOTION
#3
Jul 06, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#4
Jul 06, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Todd Blanche,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin,Elisa M. Rodriguez for U.S. Department of Homeland Security,Elisa M. Rodriguez for U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Warden of California City Immigration Processing Center (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#5
Jul 06, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 7/6/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in Counts 1 and 2 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Morillo v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01533-DJC-AC; see also E.L.D.M. v Becerra, No. 1:25-cv-01906-DJC-JDP. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before July 9, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before July 10, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 07/06/2026)
Jul 06, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings
Parties
(HC) Kaur
Party
Warden of California City Immigration Processing Center
Party