Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-05112

#1

Jul 02, 2026

PETITION against All Defendants by Zamir Faizi. Attorney Pedraza, Karen added. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order of Release on Recognizance, # 2 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 3 Exhibit I-830, # 4 Exhibit Zamir Faizi Declaration, # 5 Exhibit Final Hearing Date, # 6 Exhibit Bond Denial, # 7 Exhibit Bond Request, # 8 Exhibit Psychological Evaluation, # 9 Exhibit CV of Psychological Evaluator, # 10 Exhibit Original Hearing Date, # 11 Exhibit Changed Hearing Date)(Pedraza, Karen) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

#2

Jul 02, 2026

MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Zamir Faizi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice to Appear, # 2 Exhibit Final Hearing Date, # 3 Exhibit Order of Release-OREC, # 4 Exhibit Psychological Evaluation)(Pedraza, Karen) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

Jul 02, 2026

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13539258. (Pedraza, Karen)

#3

Jul 06, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney Karen Pedraza re Civil Cover Sheet: Under Local Rule 200, every complaint, amended complaint, or other document initiating a civil action shall be accompanied by a completed civil cover sheet, on a form available from the Clerk and on the Court's website. Please file your civil cover sheet. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444. (Deputy Clerk AML) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#4

Jul 06, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#5

Jul 06, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Sergio Albarran,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Tonya Andrews,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Todd Blanche,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Executive Office for Immigration Review,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullen,Elisa M. Rodriguez for U.S. Department of Homeland Security (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#6

Jul 06, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Zamir Faizi. (Pedraza, Karen) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

#7

Jul 06, 2026

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/6/2026: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the pending motion and petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance if they have not already done so. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Tuesday, 7/7/2026. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. If respondents oppose this court ruling on the underlying petition, then respondents are DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in their opposition. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 07/06/2026)

Jul 06, 2026

Minute Order

#8

Jul 07, 2026

Extension of Time

Jul 08, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for Extension of Time AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings