Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-04201
Gutierrez Garcia v. Blanche
Completed
Case Information
Filed: July 03, 2026
Assigned to:
Jason K Pulliam
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: September 04, 2026
Last Activity:
September 08, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jul 03, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXWDC-22242686), filed by Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Garcia. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit ICE Detainee Locator, # 2 Exhibit Automated Case Information System, # 3 Exhibit Identity Document, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Cote, C.M.) (Entered: 07/03/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jul 03, 2026
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) .
Jul 03, 2026
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Stephenson (mgr)
Jul 06, 2026
To be Referred to SA Mag Judge
Jul 06, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
#2
Jul 07, 2026
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (r013) (Entered: 07/07/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#3
Jul 09, 2026
Text ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) Petitioner's alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability; (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rw) (Entered: 07/09/2026)
#4
Jul 09, 2026
ORDER FOR OMNIBUS ADVISORY. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (r013) (Entered: 07/09/2026)
Main Document:
Order
Jul 09, 2026
Order
#5
Jul 13, 2026
ORDER VACATING re 4 Order for Omnibus Advisory. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (r013) (Entered: 07/13/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#6
Jul 16, 2026
RESPONSE to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Sylvester Ortega, David Venturella. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Anderson, Edmond) (Entered: 07/16/2026)
Main Document:
Response
#7
Jul 23, 2026
RESPONSE Petitioner's Reply to 3 Order,,,,, 6 Response by Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Garcia. (Cote, C.M.) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
Main Document:
Response
#8
Aug 25, 2026
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Johnny K. Sutton on behalf of Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Garcia. Attorney Johnny K. Sutton added to party Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Garcia(pty:pet) (Sutton, Johnny) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Notice of Attorney Appearance
#9
Aug 25, 2026
MOTION to Expedite by Jose Jesus Gutierrez-Garcia. (Cote, C.M.) (Entered: 08/25/2026)
Main Document:
Expedite
#10
Sep 04, 2026
TEXT ORDER GRANTING 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS and GRANTING 9 Motion to Expedite. Respondents have submitted a response in opposition to the petition, but has filed no response to the motion and the time for doing so has passed. Petitioner has filed a reply in support of his petition, and the Court has expedited this matter due to the uncontested motion, wherein he identifies serious health issues, and clarifies that he claims that Respondents have violated procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment based on a significant presence in the United States. While many factors affect when the Court can reach any given habeas petition and not every claimed medical issue is sufficient to expedite ruling, medical issues coupled with an established pathway for granting release of an unlawfully detained individual provides enough to expedite this case.After reviewing the briefing, provided evidence, and applicable law, the Court grants the petition based on the law as set out and analyzed in Longoria Mendoza v. Noem, 823 F. Supp. 3d 636 (W.D. Tex. 2026) and numerous other cases decided by the undersigned. While there are differences between this case and Longoria Mendoza, none warrant a different result. For reasons previously stated in Longoria Mendoza, the Court finds that (1) it has jurisdiction to consider the arguments presented in the instant habeas petition; (2) any asserted failure to exhaust administrative remedies is excused; (3) Respondents have violated Petitioner's procedural due process rights; and (4) fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are not available in habeas corpus proceedings like this one. The Court treats the instant action solely as a habeas action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and declines to consider any claim other than the alleged violation of procedural due process. The Court has considered the arguments Respondents make in response and rejects them for reasons stated in prior cases.Under the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court concludes Petitioner's detention is unlawful, and habeas relief is proper. Because Petitioner has no known criminal history, has established a significant presence in the United States that requires due process protection, and there is no indication of flight risk or danger to the community, it is ORDERED that on or before September 6, 2026, Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner Jose Jesus Gutierrez Garcia from custody to a public location, under appropriate conditions of release. Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner's counsel of the exact location and exact time of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. Any possible or anticipated removal or transfer of Petitioner under this present detention is PROHIBITED. No later than the next business day after the ordered release date, Respondents shall FILE a status report to confirm whether Petitioner has been released. If counsel for Petitioner disagrees with any aspect of the filed Status Report, counsel may file a separate Status Report. A written final judgment will be issued separately to summarize the orders of the Court and to close this habeas case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rw) (Entered: 09/04/2026)
#11
Sep 04, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (cih) (Entered: 09/04/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment AND ~Util - Set/Clear Flags
Sep 04, 2026
Order on Motion to Expedite
#12
Sep 08, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, Sylvester Ortega, David Venturella. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Fischer, Deborah) (Entered: 09/08/2026)
Main Document:
Status Report
Parties
Blanche
Party
Gutierrez Garcia
Party