Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01671

#1

Nov 28, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Respondents by Jose Osvaldo Ferreira Junior. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12630608) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vergara, Jose) (Entered: 11/28/2025)

#2

Nov 28, 2025

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Osvaldo Ferreira Junior. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Notice, # 4 Proof of Service, # 5 Proposed Order, # 6 TRO checklist)(Vergara, Jose) (Entered: 11/28/2025)

#3

Nov 29, 2025

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/2/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form) (Deputy Clerk JJD) (Entered: 11/29/2025)

#4

Dec 01, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Vergara, Jose) (Entered: 12/01/2025)

#5

Dec 01, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/1/2025: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order on or before 12/3/2025. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 12/5/2025. The matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary.(Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk JRW) (Entered: 12/01/2025)

Dec 01, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#6

Dec 04, 2025

REPLY by Jose Osvaldo Ferreira Junior re 2 Temporary Restraining Order. (Vergara, Jose) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

#7

Dec 04, 2025

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney William Dean Carter for Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, Timothy S. Robbins, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Carter, William) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

#8

Dec 04, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued on 12/4/2025 by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins: On 12/1/2025, the court Ordered Respondents to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (See Doc. No. 5 ) Respondents have not complied with that Order. Accordingly, Respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, no later than noon on 12/5/2025, why the court should not deem Petitioner's Motion unopposed. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

Dec 04, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#9

Dec 05, 2025

RESPONSE to ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, ECF No. 8, by Respondents. (Carter, William) Modified on 12/8/2025 (KLY). (Entered: 12/05/2025)

#10

Dec 05, 2025

STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER to Modify the Briefing Schedule re 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by the Parties. (Carter, William) Modified on 12/8/2025 (KLY). (Entered: 12/05/2025)

#11

Dec 05, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/5/2025: On 12/5/2025, Respondents filed a 9 Response to the court's Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 8, and the parties filed a 10 Stipulation and Proposed Order to modify the briefing schedule for Petitioner's 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Having considered the parties' filings, the Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 8, is hereby DISCHARGED, and the court ORDERS the following briefing schedule: Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition by 12/10/2025, and Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, by 12/12/2025. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/05/2025)

Dec 05, 2025

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#12

Dec 09, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued on 12/9/2025 by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins: On 12/5/2025, the court issued an 11 Order directing Respondents to file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition by 12/10/2025 to Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Labrador-Prato v. Noem et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

#13

Dec 09, 2025

OPPOSITION by Respondents Pamela Bondi, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department of Homeland Security to 2 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. (Carter, William) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

#14

Dec 09, 2025

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 12/9/2025: In Respondents' 13 Opposition to Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Respondents contend that Petitioner is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b). However, Respondents acknowledge the caselaw from this court in Labrador-Prato v. Noem et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and note "[t]here is no provision of law or any fact here which substantively distinguishes this case from Labrador-Prato." Accordingly, pursuant to the court's reasoning in Labrador-Prato, Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Rrestraining Order is GRANTED, and the court ORDERS the following: (1) Petitioner Jose Osvaldo Ferreira Junior shall be released immediately from the Respondents' custody; (2) Respondents shall not impose any additional restriction on him, such as electronic monitoring, unless that is determined to be necessary at a future pre-deprivation/custody hearing; and (3) If the Government seeks to re-detain Petitioner, it must provide no less than 7 days' notice to Petitioner and must hold a pre-deprivation bond hearing before a neutral arbiter pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations, at which Petitioner's eligibility for bond must be considered. Moreover, in light of Respondents' non-opposition to treating Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (see Doc. No. 13 at 1), and given that the standard for issuing a Temporary Restraining Order is "substantially identical" to the standard for issuing a Preliminary Injunction, Stuhlbarg Int'l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001), the court hereby ISSUES a Preliminary Injunction on the same terms. This case is REFERRED to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 12/09/2025)

Dec 09, 2025

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO

Dec 09, 2025

Minute Order

#15

Dec 16, 2025

06 - HC/Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response