Active
Case Information
Filed: June 30, 2026
Assigned to:
Julien Xavier Neals
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
July 01, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 30, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17602836.), filed by JOSE MANUEL REYES MORENO. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44, # 2 Exhibit A, Proof of Termination, # 3 Exhibit B, Family Ties)(MAKABI, PERHAM) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jun 30, 2026
Case Assigned to Judge Julien Xavier Neals. (ps)
#2
Jul 01, 2026
TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 7/1/2026. (ps) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
#3
Jul 01, 2026
TEXT ORDER - Before the Court is Petitioner Jose Manuel Reye Moreno's ("Petitioner") Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his continued detention by immigration authorities. (ECF No. 1 .) Petitioner, a native of Mexico, entered the United States in or around 2006 and has remained here since. (See id.) Petitioner contends that he is unlawfully detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b) and is entitled to release or a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). (See id.) Based on this Court's statutory interpretation in Suazo Rivera v. Blanche, No. 26-3892 (BRM) (D.N.J. April 29, 2026) and in Sandhu v. Tsoukaris, No. 25-14607 (BRM) (D.N.J. November 20, 2025), the Court finds the facts asserted in the Petition establish that Petitioner cannot be mandatorily detained under § 1225(b)(1) or (b)(2) as he was detained in the interior of the country several years after his arrival. Although Respondents may have been able to lawfully detain Petitioner under a different statute, they instead detained him under § 1225(b). The Court will not correct Respondents' unlawful application of § 1225(b) and detention of Petitioner by converting Petitioner's detention to a "potentially lawful alternate form under a different statute with different procedural requirements and rules." Fajardo-Nugra v. Soto, No. 26-975, 2026 WL 579192, at *2 (D.N.J. Mar. 2, 2026) (granting Petitioner's habeas petition and ordering Petitioner's release based on the Government's flawed application of § 1225(b)(2).) Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, subject to the following, Petitioner's Petition (ECF No. 1 ) is GRANTED and Respondents shall RELEASE Petitioner within twenty-four (24) hours of the entry of this Text Order, under the same conditions, if any, that existed prior to his detention. It is further ORDERED that Respondents shall return to Petitioner all personal property belonging to Petitioner - including, but not limited to, any driver's license, passport, immigration documents, currency, or cellphone - that was seized during the detention. It is further ORDERED that Respondents are permanently enjoined from detaining Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), which the Court has found inapplicable to him. And it is further ORDERED that Respondents shall not arrest, detain, or otherwise take Petitioner into custody under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) for a period of 14 days following his release, to ensure full effectuation of this Court's judgment and to prevent circumvention of the relief granted. It is finally ORDERED that if Respondents contend that this matter is factually distinguishable from Suazo Rivera and Sandhu, they shall file an expedited answer to the Petition within three (3) days of the date of this Text Order, and Petitioner may file a reply within three (3) days of receipt of the expedited answer.So Ordered by Judge Julien Xavier Neals on 7/1/2026. (kd) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
Jul 01, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Jul 01, 2026
Text Order
Jul 01, 2026
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm