District of Massachusetts • 1:26-cv-12960

#1

Jun 29, 2026

Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11850858 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Leandro Da Silva Guimaraes. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Cerretani, Gabriela) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#2

Jun 29, 2026

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (MBM) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#3

Jun 29, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Order Concerning Service of Petition, Stay of Transfer or Removal, and Required Response. (CEH) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#4

Jun 29, 2026

General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (CEH) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#5

Jun 29, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing Order Regarding Motion Practice. (CEH) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

#6

Jun 29, 2026

Copy re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition emailed to AUSA Annapurna Balakrishna,Rayford Farquhar, and USAMA Civil Process on 6/29/2026 at 1:03 pm and mailed to all respondents (CEH) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

Jun 29, 2026

Notice of Case Assignment

Jun 29, 2026

Copy Mailed

#7

Jul 01, 2026

Notice of Appearance

#8

Jul 01, 2026

Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241

#9

Jul 02, 2026

District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Before the Court is Petitioner Leandro Da Silva Guimaraes’ Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Dkt. 1]. Respondents submit that the legal issues presented in this Petition “are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Gomes Cardoso v. Hyde, et al., No. 25-CV-13935-AK (D. Mass. Feb. 19, 2026)” [Dkt. 8 at 1], in which the Court held that full due process protections apply to non-citizens, and that the Due Process Clause is violated when non-citizens who have been paroled into the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(A) are subject to mandatory detention without notice or opportunity to be heard. On the facts before it, the Court does not find reason to deviate from the analysis presented in Gomes Cardoso, No. 25-CV-13935-AK. Accordingly, Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing.Petitioner’s Petition [Dkt. 1] is GRANTED. Respondents are ORDERED to provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within 10 calendar days of this Order. Respondents are ENJOINED from denying Petitioner bond on the basis that he is detained pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). Respondents are ORDERED to file a status report within 14 calendar days of this Order stating whether Petitioner has been granted bond, and, if his request for bond was denied, the reasons for that denial.(CEH) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

Jul 02, 2026

Order