Eastern District of California • 1:25-cv-01644

#1

Nov 25, 2025

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by Ali Reza Gholami, Jawad Gholami. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-12625205) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A Parole Documents)(McGoldrick, Brian) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

#2

Nov 25, 2025

PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 12/29/2025. (Attachments: # 1 Order re Consent) (Deputy Clerk JPX) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

#3

Nov 28, 2025

CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (McGoldrick, Brian) (Entered: 11/28/2025)

#4

Dec 04, 2025

MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/4/2025: On 11/25/2025, petitioner filed a 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner's prayer for relief includes a request that the court order respondents to show cause within three days of the date of entry of that order why the 1 petition should not be granted. (Doc. No. 1 at 23 .) If petitioner seeks emergency relief, petitioner is DIRECTED to file a motion for temporary restraining order. (Deputy Clerk PAB) (Entered: 12/04/2025)

Dec 04, 2025

Minute Order

#5

Dec 09, 2025

Temporary Restraining Order

#6

Dec 10, 2025

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/10/2025: Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondents shall not take any action to remove petitioners from the United States or to move petitioners out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioners' pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order. Further, no later than today, 12/10/2025, by 5:00 PM, petitioner's counsel is DIRECTED (1) to serve respondents with a copy of the petition, motion for temporary restraining order, and accompanying papers, along with this order, by e-mail to the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California; and (2) to promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for respondents shall promptly enter Notices of Appearance. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 5 motion for temporary restraining order by 5:00 PM on Thursday, 12/11/2025. In that opposition, respondents shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decision in Rocha Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. If the parties were to jointly agree upon a less demanding briefing schedule, the court will consider the parties' proposal. (Text Only Entry). (Deputy Clerk JRW) (Entered: 12/10/2025)

#7

Dec 10, 2025

Certificate / Proof of Service

Dec 10, 2025

Minute Order

#8

Dec 11, 2025

Opposition to Motion

#9

Dec 16, 2025

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#10

Dec 29, 2025

STIPULATION to a Briefing Schedule by All Respondents. (Tubesing, Robin) Modified on 1/8/2026 (HAH). (Entered: 12/29/2025)