Western District of Kentucky • 4:26-cv-00432

#1

Jun 22, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Giselle Saileth Castilla Ramirez. (No filing fee or IFP submitted) (Attachments: # 1 Petition, # 2 List of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: Letters of Support) (HMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#2

Jun 22, 2026

Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Benjamin Beaton. (HMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#3

Jun 22, 2026

MOTION Requesting Court Assistance with Service of Process filed by Petitioner Giselle Saileth Castilla Ramirez. (HMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#4

Jun 22, 2026

NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (HMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#5

Jun 22, 2026

NOTICE of Deficiency re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.Reason for Deficiency: NO FILING FEE ($5.00) OR APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES.. Failure to comply will be brought to the attention of the Court. Response due by 7/22/2026. (HMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#6

Jun 22, 2026

NOTICE of Appearance by Calesia Henson on behalf of Field Office Director, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney, Western District of Kentucky, Warden/Jailer, Grayson County Jail (Henson, Calesia) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

Jun 22, 2026

Remark (Public)

Jun 22, 2026

REMARK: Electronic notification of the petition and any subsequent order constitutes valid service on all federal respondents named therein as of the date of this remark pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, which the Court is applying to these cases. (HMC)

#7

Jun 25, 2026

Response to Notice of Deficiency

#8

Jun 26, 2026

TEXT ORDER: In response to the pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DN 1 ), the Court directs the Respondents to show cause, no later than 6/30/2026, why the writ should not be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The Government should address whether Lopez-Campos v. Raycraft, 175 F.4th 713 (6th Cir. 2026), controls the habeas petition. Unless the parties file notice that they seek a hearing, the Court will presume that the petition presents no material factual disputes and decide it on the papers. To the extent the Government contends that the Petitioner was granted humanitarian parole under § 1182(d)(5)(A) or that an IJ has already found that the Petitioner was a flight risk or a threat to the public, it must include those facts and arguments in its response to this order. The Clerk of Court shall forward by certified mail, return receipt requested, one copy of the petition and this order on each Respondent who has not been designated by the United States Attorney's Office, as agreed to by the Attorney's Office and the Clerk in the 1/20/2026 Memorandum of Understanding, to receive electronic notice and service. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached.cc: Counsel, Petitioner (pro se via USPS), Respondents (as directed) (HMC) (Entered: 06/26/2026)

#9

Jun 26, 2026

Notice (Other)

Jun 26, 2026

Order - TEXT ONLY

#10

Jun 30, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

Jul 02, 2026

Filing Fee Received

Jul 02, 2026

Filing fee: $ 5.00 receipt number 300016972 by Giselle Saileth Castilla Ramirez. (SLK)

#11

Jul 06, 2026

Notice (Other)