Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04723

#1

Jun 19, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against All Defendants by WILLIAM ALFREDO BE CAAMAL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Marin, Jose) (Entered: 06/19/2026)

#2

Jun 19, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by WILLIAM ALFREDO BE CAAMAL. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Marin, Jose) (Entered: 06/19/2026)

#3

Jun 19, 2026

CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by WILLIAM ALFREDO BE CAAMAL. (Marin, Jose) (Entered: 06/19/2026)

Jun 19, 2026

PAYMENT for habeas petition filing fee in the amount of $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13480120. (Marin, Jose)

#4

Jun 22, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS. (Deputy Clerk MR) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#5

Jun 22, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Acting or Current Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Current or Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Current or Acting Office Director, ICE Fresno Field Office,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Warden of Mesa Verde Detention Center (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

#6

Jun 22, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 6/22/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by the 1 petition. See e.g., Crispin M.C. v. Noem, No. 1:25-CV-01487-KES-HBK (HC), 2026 WL 70553 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2026); J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01354-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3013328 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025); Lepe v. Andrews, 801 F. Supp. 3d 1104 (E.D. Cal. 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before June 24, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Crispin M.C. v. Noem, J.A.C.P. v. Wofford, and Lepe v. Andrews and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 06/22/2026)

Jun 22, 2026

Minute Order