Active
Case Information
Filed: June 18, 2026
Assigned to:
Patti B. Saris
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity:
June 25, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 18, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11830190 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Estiven Tobon Cardona. (Attachments: # 1 Category Form, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Micheroni, Nicole) (Entered: 06/18/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
Jun 22, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (NMC) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
#3
Jun 22, 2026
Service Order-2241 Petition
Main Document:
Service Order-2241 Petition
#4
Jun 22, 2026
General Order 19-02
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
#5
Jun 22, 2026
Copy re 3 Service Order - 2241 Petition, 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) mailed to Respondents and courtesy copy emailed to Duty AUSA on 6/22/2026. (CGK) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Jun 22, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
Jun 22, 2026
Copy Mailed
#6
Jun 24, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#7
Jun 24, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#8
Jun 25, 2026
District Judge Patti B. Saris: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Estiven Alonso Tobon Cardona. Petitioner Estiven Alonso Tobon Cardona ("Petitioner") has filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge his immigration detention without a bond hearing. The government concedes "that the legal issues presented in this [p]etition are similar to those recently addressed by this Court in Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz" and that if "the Court follow[s] its reasoning in Guerrero Orellana..., it would reach the same result here." Dkt. 7 at 1. Given this concession and for the reasons stated in Guerrero Orellana, the Court concludes that Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing in immigration court. See Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 802 F. Supp. 3d 297, 306-12 (D. Mass. 2025), appeal filed, No. 25-2152 (1st Cir. Dec. 2, 2025); Guerrero Orellana v. Moniz, 813 F. Supp. 3d 185, 193-95 (D. Mass. 2025), appeal filed, No. 26-1094 (1st Cir. Jan. 22, 2026).Accordingly, the Court ALLOWS the habeas petition (Dkt. 1 ) and ORDERS that the government release Petitioner unless he is provided with a bond hearing that complies with the standards outlined in Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19 (1st Cir. 2021), within seven business days of the date of this order. No later than fourteen days from the date of this order, the government shall file a status report confirming that Petitioner has received a bond hearing (or has been released in lieu of a bond hearing) and stating the outcome of the bond hearing.(CGK) (Entered: 06/25/2026)
#9
Jun 25, 2026
SET DEADLINES: Status Report due by 7/9/2026.(CGK) (Entered: 06/25/2026)
Jun 25, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Firm