Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04630
(HC) Alvarado Izarraraz v. Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Completed
Case Information
Filed: June 15, 2026
Assigned to:
Daniel J. Calabretta
Referred to:
Dennis M. Cota
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
8:1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Completed: June 29, 2026
Last Activity:
June 30, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 15, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility by Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jun 15, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
#3
Jun 15, 2026
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
In Forma Pauperis
#4
Jun 15, 2026
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
#5
Jun 17, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
Immigration New Case Documents
#6
Jun 17, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document:
DESIGNATION
#7
Jun 17, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 6/17/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states he was detained on 6/3/2025, nearly a year before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the 1 Petition. See e.g., Selis Tinoco v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01762-DC-JDP, 2025 WL 3567862 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2025), Labrador-Prato v. Noem, 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and D.L.C. v. Wofford, 1:25-cv-01996-DC-JDP, 2026 WL 25511 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12:00 PM on 6/22/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 7/6/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Jun 17, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: Minute Order, filed at Doc. No. 7, served on Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS)
Jun 17, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Immigration New Case Documents served on Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk AKP)
Jun 17, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings
Jun 17, 2026
Service by Mail
#8
Jun 22, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document:
Dismiss
#9
Jun 26, 2026
Order Reassigning Case
Main Document:
Order Reassigning Case
Jun 26, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Order served on Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk OML)
Jun 26, 2026
Service by Mail
#10
Jun 29, 2026
Certificate / Proof of Service
Main Document:
Certificate / Proof of Service
#11
Jun 29, 2026
MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/29/2026: On review, the present action is duplicative of 1:25-cv-01774-DJC-DMC. As such, this action is dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner filing a future habeas petition seeking relief on any other basis. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. This order resolves all pending motions. CASE CLOSED. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk JRW) (Entered: 06/29/2026)
Jun 29, 2026
Minute Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Jun 29, 2026
Service by Mail
Jun 29, 2026
SERVICE BY MAIL: 11 Minute Order served on Juan Ramon Alvarado Izarraraz. (Deputy Clerk JRW)
#12
Jun 30, 2026
Appoint Counsel
Main Document:
Appoint Counsel
Parties
(HC) Alvarado Izarraraz
Party
Warden, Golden State Annex Detention Facility
Party