District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-02684

#1

Jun 16, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11083340)Attorney Anna Lee Dichter added to party Raimundo Ramos Paz(pty:pet), filed by Raimundo Ramos Paz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dichter, Anna) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

#2

Jun 16, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#3

Jun 17, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (manoe, ) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#4

Jun 17, 2026

Administrative Notice: Duplicate filing fee received. Financial notified and a refund is pending. (Text Only Entry) (dhern, ) (Entered: 06/17/2026)

#5

Jun 18, 2026

Order to Show Cause

#6

Jun 24, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service re 5 Order to Show Cause,,,, by Petitioner Raimundo Ramos Paz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Dichter, Anna) (Entered: 06/24/2026)

#7

Jun 30, 2026

RESPONSE to 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 5 Order to Show Cause,,,, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George ValdezAttorney Logan P. Brown added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Logan P. Brown added to party George Valdez(pty:res). (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 06/30/2026)

#8

Jul 01, 2026

CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez All parties do not consent.. (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 07/01/2026)

#9

Jul 02, 2026

REPLY to 7 Response, by Petitioner Raimundo Ramos Paz. (Dichter, Anna) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

#10

Jul 02, 2026

Order Reassigning Case

#11

Jul 02, 2026

MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court are Petitioner's habeas petition, ECF No. 1, Respondents' response thereto, ECF No. 7, and Petitioner's reply, ECF No. 9. In their response, Respondents state that they "are not submitting a brief in opposition to the Petition detailing the facts and circumstances of this case." ECF No. 7 at 1. In light of this representation, as well as the Tenth Circuit's recent decision holding that § 1225's mandatory detention provision does not apply to noncitizens who are apprehended while in the interior of the United States, see generally Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, et. al, No. 26-6019, --- F.4th ---, 2026 WL 1876709 819, *17 (10th Cir. June 30, 2026), the Court GRANTS Petitioner's petition, ECF No. 1. It is ORDERED that Respondents shall release Petitioner from custody immediately, but no later than within 24 hours of this Order, and may not impose any additional conditions of release or supervision beyond those he was subject to immediately prior to his recent detention. Respondents SHALL FILE a status report within TWO DAYS of this Order to certify compliance. Respondents are further ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining Petitioner unless they demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence at a pre-deprivation bond hearing, that Petitioner is a flight risk or danger to the community such that his physical custody is legally justified. At any such bond hearing, the government shall bear the burden of proof. The Court notes that, while Respondents argue a bond hearing is the appropriate remedy, see ECF No. 7 at 2, their arguments fail to persuade. Compare ECF No. 7 at 2, with Santillan Quiroz, 2026 WL 1876709 819, *17 n.13. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 07/02/2026. Text Only Entry (cnslc8, ) (Entered: 07/02/2026)

Jul 02, 2026

Minute Order

#12

Jul 06, 2026

STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Brown, Logan) (Entered: 07/06/2026)