Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04541

#1

Jun 12, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility by Saravia Vielman Gerson Ulises. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

#2

Jun 12, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Saravia Vielman Gerson Ulises. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

#3

Jun 16, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

#4

Jun 16, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Camilo Rodriguez, GOVT for Warden, Central Valley Annex Detention Facility (Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

#5

Jun 16, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/16/2026: On 6/12/2026, petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner also filed a 2 motion for temporary restraining order on the same date. Pending the issuance of the court's order resolving the pending petition for writ of habeas corpus, and unless and until the court orders otherwise, the court ORDERS that respondent shall not take any action to remove petitioner from the United States or to move petitioner out of the Eastern District of California. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (acknowledging the court's express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction). Given the exigent circumstances present, the court finds that this order is warranted to maintain the status quo pending its forthcoming order resolving petitioner's pending 2 motion for a temporary restraining order. Further, the court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and observes that this case may involve core issues that the undersigned has previously addressed in this context. Accordingly, the parties are advised that if the court concludes that petitioner is entitled to the relief that is requested in the pending motion, then the court will also rule on the merits of the underlying petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering the merits of the habeas petition and motion for preliminary injunction simultaneously). Counsel for respondent has already entered a 4 notice of appearance. Respondents shall file a written opposition to the pending 2 motion for temporary restraining order no later than 5:00 PM on Thursday, 6/18/2026. In that opposition, respondent shall substantively address whether any provision of law or fact in this case would distinguish it from this court's decisions in Ayala Cajina v. Wofford, No. 1:25-cv-01566-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 3251083 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2025); Perez v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01540-DAD-CSK (HC), 2025 WL 3187578 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2025); Chavarria v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01755-DAD-AC, 2025 WL 3533606 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025); Yang v. Kaiser, No. 2:25-cv-02205-DAD-AC (HC), 2025 WL 2791778 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2025); Quichimbo-Jimenez v. Warden, Cal. City Corr. Ctr., 2:26-cv-00739-DAD-EFB (HC), 2026 WL 679378 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2026); Cardenas v. Chestnut, et al., No. 1:26-cv-02073-DAD-SCR (HC), 2026 WL 785871 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026); J.P.C. v. Chestnut, 1:26-cv-02108-DAD-JDP, 2026 WL 788129 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2026), and other similar cases previously decided by this court, or otherwise indicate that the matter is not substantively distinguishable. The court will construe failure to distinguish the above cited cases as a concession that the cases are not substantively distinguishable. Further, if respondent opposes this court ruling on the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus as well, then respondent is DIRECTED to indicate so and provide substantive reasons in support thereof in the opposition. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRN) (Entered: 06/16/2026)

Jun 16, 2026

Service by Mail

Jun 16, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order, served on Saravia Vielman Gerson Ulises. (Deputy Clerk CRN)

Jun 16, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Saravia Vielman Gerson Ulises. (Deputy Clerk AKP)

Jun 16, 2026

Minute Order

Jun 22, 2026

Service by Mail

#8

Jun 25, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#9

Jun 25, 2026

Judgment

Jun 25, 2026

Service by Mail