Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-01118

Urrego Duarte v. Oddo

Active

Case Information

Filed: June 12, 2026
Assigned to: J. Nicholas Ranjan
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity: June 17, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jun 12, 2026
Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $5, receipt number APAWDC-9651717), filed by Diego Arturo Urrego Duarte. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Order to Show Cause, # 3 Exhibit A: Evidence Filed in Support of Bond Request, # 4 Exhibit B: Immigration Judge Order on Request for Bond) (Kerben, Reuben) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
Main Document: ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#2
Jun 15, 2026
EXHIBITS Transcript of Bond Proceedings in Support of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Diego Arturo Urrego Duarte. (Kerben, Reuben) Modified text to add link on 6/16/2026. (keh) (Entered: 06/15/2026)
Main Document: EXHIBITS
#3
Jun 17, 2026
ORDER denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. After reviewing the transcript from Petitioner's bond hearing held on June 8, 2026, the Court finds that the hearing was fundamentally fair. The requirements of a fundamentally fair hearing are that Petitioner: "(1) is entitled to factfinding based on a record produced before the decisionmaker and disclosed to him or her; (2) must be allowed to make arguments on his or her own behalf; and (3) has the right to an individualized determination of his [or her] interests." Ghanem v. Warden Essex Cnty. Corr. Facility, No. 21-1908, 2022 WL 574624, at *2 (3d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022) (quoting Kamara v. Att'y Gen. of U.S., 420 F.3d 202, 211 (3d Cir. 2005)). The Court finds that these requirements were met, and can otherwise discern no other flaws in the fairness of the hearing that rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 6/17/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Jun 17, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Jun 17, 2026
Order