Active
Case Information
Filed: June 12, 2026
Assigned to:
Charlotte N. Sweeney
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Active
Last Activity:
August 20, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 12, 2026
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 118388), filed by Honcharuk Serhii. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(eguth, ) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
Main Document:
APPLICATION
#2
Jun 12, 2026
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eguth, ) (Entered: 06/12/2026)
#3
Jun 15, 2026
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiency. Ordered that Petitioner cure the deficiency designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agarc, ) (Entered: 06/15/2026)
#4
Jun 25, 2026
AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Honcharuk Serhii.(eluce, ) (Entered: 06/25/2026)
Main Document:
AMENDED
#5
Jul 16, 2026
ORDER to File Amended Habeas Application. It is ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file an amended habeas application providing a clear statement of the federal claims he is asserting and the facts supporting those claims. If Petitioner fails to file an amended habeas application as directed within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/16/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (eluce, ) (Entered: 07/16/2026)
#6
Aug 03, 2026
AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Honcharuk Serhii. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(eluce, ) (Entered: 08/04/2026)
Main Document:
AMENDED
#7
Aug 05, 2026
ORDER Drawing Case. It is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/5/2026. (Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02616-NRN.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (eluce, ) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document:
Order Reassigning Case
#8
Aug 05, 2026
Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eluce, ) (Entered: 08/05/2026)
Main Document:
Magistrate
#9
Aug 07, 2026
ORDER the Court respectfully ORDERS the Clerk of Court to, no later than August 13, 2026, (1) serve Respondent with a copy of the Petition and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and by overnight mail, and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for Respondent shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Within three calendar days of service, Respondent is ORDERED TO RESPOND to the Petition and is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted. Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondent SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order.It is further ORDERED that within seven calendar days of service, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (ECF No. 8 ) indicating either the unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 08/06/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, ) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
#10
Aug 07, 2026
CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re 9 Order, 6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (jrobe, ) ( # 1 USPS Certified Mail Receipts) (jrobe, ). Modified to add attachment on 8/10/2026 (jrobe, ). (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Main Document:
CERTIFICATE
#11
Aug 07, 2026
Acknowledgement Letter filed on behalf of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado.(jrobe, ) (Entered: 08/10/2026)
Main Document:
Acknowledgement
#15
Aug 17, 2026
CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Serhii Honcharuk - Petitioner Party Does Not Consent. (dhern, ) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT
#16
Aug 17, 2026
USPS certified mail receipt return for Todd Lyons re: 10 CERTIFICATE of Service. (Attachments: # 1 USPS certified mail receipt return for Kelei Walker, # 2 USPS certified mail receipt for Juan Baltazar)(jrobe, ) (Entered: 08/19/2026)
Main Document:
USPS
#12
Aug 18, 2026
CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Kelei Walker All parties do not consent.. (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
CONSENT
#13
Aug 18, 2026
NOTICE re 12 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Kelei Walker (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
NOTICE
#14
Aug 18, 2026
RESPONSE to 6 Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 9 Order,,,,, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Kelei Walker. (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 08/18/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#17
Aug 19, 2026
CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to 15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02616-CNS. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) (Entered: 08/19/2026)
#18
Aug 19, 2026
MINUTE ORDER: Before the Court is Petitioner's amended habeas petition, ECF No. 6, and Respondents' Response to it, ECF No. 14 . In the response, Respondents state that they "are not submitting a brief in opposition to the Petition detailing the facts and circumstances of this case." ECF No. 14 at 1. In light of the representation in Respondents' response, as well as the Tenth Circuit's recent decision holding that § 1225's mandatory detention provision does not apply to noncitizens who are apprehended while in the interior of the United States, see generally Santillan Quiroz v. Mullin, et. al, 180 F.4th 1226, 1246 (10th Cir. 2026), the Court GRANTS Petitioner's amended habeas petition, ECF No. 6. Respondents SHALL TRANSFER Petitioner to Florida and RELEASE him from custody IMMEDIATELY, but no later than within 24 hours of this Order, with all of Petitioner's personal property returned to him, including any driver's license, passport, employment authorization documents, and/or identification cards that were taken into Respondents' possession in connection with Petitioner's detention; additionally, upon Petitioner's release, Respondents may not impose any additional conditions of release or supervision beyond those that he was subject to immediately prior to his recent detention. If arranging a flight to Florida will prolong Petitioner's detention by more than 24 hours after entry of this Order, Respondents MUST immediately notify Petitioner and inquire as to whether Petitioner would prefer to be released immediately or wait until the government has arranged his transport back to Florida. Respondents SHALL FILE a status report within TWO DAYS of this Order to certify compliance. Respondents are further ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from re-detaining Petitioner unless Respondents demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence at a pre-deprivation bond hearing, that Petitioner is a flight risk or danger to the community such that his physical custody is legally justified. At any such bond hearing, the government shall bear the burden of proof. The Court notes that, while Respondents contend that a bond hearing is the appropriate remedy, see ECF No. 14 at 2, this argument fail to persuade. Compare ECF No. 14 at 2, with Santillan Quiroz, 180 F.4th at 1251 n.13; see also, e.g., Singh v. Baltazar, 819 F. Supp. 3d 1247, 125051 (D. Colo. 2026). By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 8/19/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, ) (Entered: 08/19/2026)
Aug 19, 2026
Minute Order
#19
Aug 20, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Todd Lyons, Kelei Walker. (Soler, Andrew) (Entered: 08/20/2026)
Main Document:
STATUS
Parties
Baltazar
Party
Serhii (PS)
Party