Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04555

#1

Jun 12, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Tonya Andrews, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin by Fernando Perez Sales. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13451492) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A - ORR Release, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B - Annand Declaration, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C - Bond Hearing Transcript, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D - IJ Bond Order, # 6 Exhibit Ex. E - IJ Memo Dec, # 7 Exhibit Ex. F - Bond Cancellation Notice)(Linares Garcia, Tania) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#2

Jun 12, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Fernando Perez Sales. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Memorandum of Authorities, # 2 Exhibit Linares Garcia Declaration, # 3 Exhibit TRO Checklist, # 4 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Linares Garcia, Tania) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#3

Jun 12, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#4

Jun 12, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Sergio Albarran,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Tonya Andrews,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Todd Blanche,Elisa M. Rodriguez for Markwayne Mullin (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#5

Jun 12, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/12/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in Count 1 of the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Garcia Mariagua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01744-DJC-CSK; Ortega v. Noem, No. 1:25-cv-01663-DJC-CKD; Lopez v. Lyons, No. 2:25-cv-03174-DJC-CKD. The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before June 17, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. Petitioner may file a reply on or before June 18, 2026. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

Jun 12, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

#8

Jun 18, 2026

Application for Pro Hac Vice and Proposed Order

#9

Jun 22, 2026

Order on Application for Pro Hac Vice

#10

Jul 09, 2026

Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#11

Jul 09, 2026

Judgment