Western District of Texas • 5:26-cv-03740

#1

Jun 10, 2026

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 DUE), filed by Tahis Nathaly Vazquez-Cobas.(r013) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#2

Jun 10, 2026

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Carlos Dantes Mejias, Jr ( Filing fee $ 100 DUE) by on behalf of Tahis Nathaly Vazquez-Cobas. (kc) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

Jun 10, 2026

Case has been randomly assigned to the docket of Honorable Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (kc)

Jun 10, 2026

Attorney Carlos Mejias is already admitted to practice. (kc)

Jun 10, 2026

If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kelly G. Stephenson (kc)

Jun 12, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Jun 12, 2026

To be Referred to SA Mag Judge

#3

Jun 15, 2026

Appear Pro Hac Vice

#4

Jun 15, 2026

TEXT ORDER FOR SERVICE of 1 for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. It is ORDERED that notice of electronic filing of 1 Petition and this Order to the United States Attorney in San Antonio, Texas, shall constitute service on the Federal Respondents and on all Respondents unless otherwise contested. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to the Petition within seven (7) days of the date of service. The response must identify: (1) Petitioner's alleged country of birth, so that Petitioner can be located in the Online Detainee Locator System; (2) Petitioner's alleged date of entry and statutory basis for removability; (3) any previous immigration detention history, e.g., whether Petitioner has previously been subject to immigration detention and, if so, the approximate date of Petitioner's previous release into the interior; and (4) Petitioner's alleged immigration status, e.g., whether Petitioner has a pending claim for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture or is subject to a final removal order. Additionally, because this case appears to turn on whether Petitioners detention without a bond hearing violates the due process rights afforded to noncitizens who have established a substantial presence in the United States, Respondents must consider the Courts prior orders addressing this question and note any material factual differences between those cases and this one. E.g., Valencia Reyes v. Noem, No. SA-25-CV-1921-XR, 2026 WL 981034 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 25, 2026); Gonzalez Carrillo v. Bondi, No. SA-26-CV-778-XR, 2026 WL 981037 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2026). If Respondents so choose, in lieu of a full response, they may instead file a response indicating that there are no material factual differences here and preserving all legal arguments made by the Federal Respondents in those cases. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner elects to file a reply, Petitioner may do so no later than seven days after the Respondents file their answers/responses. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (TMlc) (Entered: 06/15/2026)

Jun 15, 2026

Remark (No Doc#)

Jun 15, 2026

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Jun 15, 2026

Order

Jun 15, 2026

Text Order TERMINATING 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. This filing appears duplicative. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (TMlc)

Jun 15, 2026

Text Order GRANTING 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing and to the extent that he has not already done so, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (TMlc)

#5

Jun 22, 2026

Response

#6

Jun 24, 2026

Notice

#7

Jun 24, 2026

Filing Fee Received

#8

Jun 24, 2026

Response

#9

Jul 08, 2026

Order