District of New Jersey • 2:25-cv-17826

ROJAS-JOSE v. SOTO

Active

Case Information

Filed: November 21, 2025
Assigned to: Michael E. Farbiarz
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: December 05, 2025
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Nov 21, 2025
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nov 21, 2025
Case assigned to Judge Michael E. Farbiarz. (tjg, )
Nov 21, 2025
Case Assigned/Reassigned
#2
Nov 24, 2025
TEXT ORDER: The Petitioner shall promptly file proof of service. So Ordered by Judge Michael E. Farbiarz on 11/24/2025. (ro, ) (Entered: 11/24/2025)
#3
Nov 24, 2025
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SANTIAGO ROJAS-JOSE re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (CHOW, MARTIN) (Entered: 11/24/2025)
Main Document: Certificate of Service
Nov 24, 2025
Order
#4
Nov 25, 2025
TEXT ORDER: As in other cases that involve seemingly identical factual circumstances, see, e.g., Chiquito Barzola v. Warden (2:25-cv-17326), Martinez Ron v. Lyons (2:25-cv-17359), Mboup v. Field Off. Dir. of N.J. Immigr. & Customs Enf't (2:25-cv-16882), and Ortega Alvarez v. Noem (2:25-cv-17401), it seems the Petitioner should be treated as covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1226. If the Respondents view this case as meaningfully distinguishable from those, the Respondents shall file a brief letter explaining why on or before November 26 at 9:00am. If no letter is received by then, (a) the Petitioner shall be treated as covered by 8 U.S.C. § 1226 and (b) the Respondents shall file a letter on or before November 26 at 5:00pm, indicating whether there has been a bail hearing and if not why not. So Ordered by Judge Michael E. Farbiarz on 11/25/2025. (ro, ) (Entered: 11/25/2025)
Nov 25, 2025
Order
#5
Nov 26, 2025
Status Report
Main Document: Status Report
#6
Dec 01, 2025
TEXT ORDER: A petition was filed, see ECF 1, a bail hearing was ordered, see ECF 4, and it was conducted. See ECF 5 . Therefore, it appears that the petition should be dismissed. See Chiquito Barzola v. Warden, No. 25-17326, slip op. at 2-3 (D.N.J. Dec. 1, 2025). If a party has a different view, it should explain why in a brief letter, to be filed on or before December 4 at 9:00am. If no persuasive letter is received, the petition will be promptly dismissed. So Ordered by Judge Michael E. Farbiarz on 12/1/2025. (ro, ) (Entered: 12/01/2025)
Dec 01, 2025
Order
Dec 05, 2025
Terminate Civil Case
Dec 05, 2025
Text Order