District of Colorado • 1:25-cv-03765

#1

Nov 24, 2025

Administrative Notice: No initiating document. Attorney contacted with instructions to file the initiating document within 24 hours. (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) (Entered: 11/24/2025)

#2

Nov 25, 2025

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10681789)Attorney Henry D. Hollithron added to party Grigor Depelian(pty:pet), filed by Grigor Depelian. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit Exhibit X, # 25 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

#3

Nov 25, 2025

Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Text Only Entry (eluce, ) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

#4

Nov 25, 2025

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eluce, ) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

#5

Nov 25, 2025

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/25/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) (Entered: 11/25/2025)

Nov 25, 2025

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

#6

Nov 26, 2025

ORDER: Upon review of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC § 2241 2, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondents with a copy of the Petition, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and by overnight mail, on or before December 3, 2025. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within seven days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the Motion and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/26. Text Only Entry (skclc1) (Entered: 11/26/2025)

Nov 26, 2025

Order to Show Cause

#7

Dec 03, 2025

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service by Petitioner Grigor Depelian. (Attachments: # 1 Receipt USPS Priority Mail Express Receipt)(Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 12/03/2025)

#8

Dec 08, 2025

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Alexandra J. Berger on behalf of Juan Baltazar, Pamela Jo Bondi, Robert Hagan, Kristi NoemAttorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Pamela Jo Bondi(pty:res), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Robert Hagan(pty:res), Attorney Alexandra J. Berger added to party Kristi Noem(pty:res) (Berger, Alexandra) (Entered: 12/08/2025)

#9

Dec 15, 2025

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 6 by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Pamela Jo Bondi, Robert Hagan, Kristi Noem. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Rosa Escareno)(Berger, Alexandra) (Entered: 12/15/2025)

#10

Dec 29, 2025

CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Pamela Jo Bondi, Robert Hagan, Kristi Noem All parties do not consent.. (Berger, Alexandra) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

#11

Dec 29, 2025

REPLY to 9 Response to Order to Show Cause by Petitioner Grigor Depelian. (Attachments: # 1 Order Denying Motion or Preliminary Injunction - Richards v. Choate)(Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 12/29/2025)

#12

Jan 05, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service as to Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Colorado by Petitioner Grigor Depelian. (Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

#13

Jan 05, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service as to respondent Pamela Jo Bondi by Petitioner Grigor Depelian. (Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

#14

Jan 05, 2026

CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service as to respondents Juan Baltazar and Robert Hagan by Petitioner Grigor Depelian. (Hollithron, Henry) (Entered: 01/05/2026)

#15

Jan 07, 2026

This Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2, the Response to the Order to Show Cause by Respondents 9, and the Reply by Petitioner 11 . According to the evidence before the Court, Petitioner was granted parole on December 2, 2022. The Notification to Grant Parole does not state a date for termination of parole. As such, Respondents were required to provide written notice to Petitioner of the termination of his parole. C.F.R. § 212.5(e)(2)(i). Courts have held that failure to provide the statutorily required written notice is a violation of Petitioner's due process rights. See Savane v. Francis, No. 1:25-cv-6666-GHW, 2025 WL 2774452, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2025). There is no evidence in the current record that establishes that Petitioner in this case was provided written notice of termination of his parole. While Petitioner raises a due process claim, he does not specifically address the issue this Court has identified. Accordingly, Petitioner and Respondent are ORDERED to submit additional briefing to this Court identifying whether Petitioner was given written notice, and if not, the effect of that failure, if any, on the claims raised in the Petition. Both parties shall submit their briefs on or before January 14, 2026. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/7/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc4) (Entered: 01/07/2026)

Jan 07, 2026

Order