Active
Case Information
Filed: June 05, 2026
Assigned to:
William Shaw Stickman IV
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity:
July 02, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 05, 2026
Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (ert) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
Main Document:
Remark:
Jun 05, 2026
Judge William S. Stickman added. (ert)
#2
Jun 16, 2026
Deficiency Order
Main Document:
Deficiency Order
#3
Jun 18, 2026
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
Main Document:
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#4
Jun 23, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document:
Case Management Order
Jun 24, 2026
Order Response/Briefing Schedule
#7
Jul 01, 2026
RESPONSE to 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PAM BONDI, BRIAN MCSHANE, KRISTI NOEM, LEONARD ODDO. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit) (Guappone, William) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
Main Document:
RESPONSE
#8
Jul 02, 2026
ORDER OF COURT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. This is Petitioner's second habeas petition before the Court. At Case No. 3:26-cv-00713, the Court afforded him habeas relief, and ordered that he receive an individualized bond hearing before a neutral immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226. (Case No. 3:26-cv-00713, ECF No. 11). That bond hearing occurred on April 30, 2026, and the immigration judge determined that Petitioner was a flight risk. (Id. at ECF No. 13). This determination is unreviewable under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e). The Court does not have the authority to sit as an appellate court over the determination of the immigration judge and to question his substantive determination on bond. Nevertheless, on June 17, 2026, Petitioner filed the instant second habeas petition, which is nearly identical to his first habeas petition. In sum, both petitions challenge the legality of Petitioner's detention and seek his immediate release or, in the alternative, a bond hearing. The Court holds that Petitioner's detention has not become unreasonable and it does not violate due process. As the Petitioner has already received habeas relief and an individualized bond hearing, the Court dismisses this action as an abuse of the writ. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 07/02/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (rgm) (Entered: 07/02/2026)
Jul 02, 2026
Order AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
Parties
AYALA LOPEZ
Party
ODDO
Party