District of New Jersey • 2:26-cv-06488

KVASHILAVA v. ROKOSKY

Active

Case Information

Filed: June 03, 2026
Assigned to: Evelyn Padin
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Active
Last Activity: June 08, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jun 03, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ANJDC-17498008.), filed by TSOTNE KVASHILAVA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit OREC, # 2 Exhibit Supplemental Entry Information, # 3 Exhibit ICE Detainee Portal Screenshot, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet)(DEANE, CONOR) (Entered: 06/03/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jun 03, 2026
TEXT ORDER. Respondents are hereby enjoined from transferring Petitioner from New Jersey pending further Order of the Court. So Ordered by Chief Judge Renee Marie Bumb on 6/3/2026. (jr) (Entered: 06/03/2026)
Jun 03, 2026
Case assigned to Judge Evelyn Padin. (jr)
Jun 03, 2026
Case Assigned/Reassigned
Jun 03, 2026
Emergent Immigration Habeas Non-transfer Order
#3
Jun 04, 2026
TEXT ORDER: Petitioner Tsotne Kvashilava filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging he is unlawfully detained by immigration authorities under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), D.E. 1 ("Petition"). It is ORDERED that, if Respondents contest Petitioner's factual allegations and/or contend that Petitioner has a criminal record and/or assert this case is distinguishable from the cases in this district previously addressing § 1225, they shall file an expedited answer to the Petition within five days of the date of entry of this Order, and Petitioner may file a reply within three days of the date of filing of Respondents' expedited answer.If Respondents do not file expedited answer, under this Court's decision in Lomeu v. Soto, No. 25-16589, 2025 WL 2981296, at *9 (D.N.J. Oct. 23, 2025), and other recent decisions in this District interpreting § 1225, including Rivera Zumba v. Bondi, No. 25-14626, 2025 WL 2753496 (D.N.J. Sept. 26, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(2)), Rivas Rodriguez v. Rokosky, No. 25-17419, 2025 WL 3485628 (D.N.J. Dec. 3, 2025) (interpreting § 1225(b)(1)), accepting Petitioner's allegations as true, the Court holds Petitioner's mandatory detention under Section 1225(b) is unlawful and further violates his liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. If Respondents do not file an expedited answer in opposition, they shall instead release Petitioner within 24 hours of this order and file a written notice of Petitioner's release within three days. If Respondents subsequently detain Petitioner under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), they shall comply with the regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 236.1(c)(8) and (d). So Ordered by Judge Evelyn Padin on 6/4/2026. (bt) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
#4
Jun 04, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document: Notice of Appearance
#5
Jun 04, 2026
Letter
Main Document: Letter
Jun 04, 2026
Text Order
Jun 05, 2026
Text Order
Jun 08, 2026
Terminate Civil Case

Parties

KVASHILAVA
Party
ROKOSKY
Party