Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04188

#1

Jun 02, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden of the California City Detention Facility by Harman-Sing Singh. (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#2

Jun 02, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Harman-Sing Singh. (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#3

Jun 02, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#4

Jun 02, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Elisa M. Rodriguez for Warden of the California City Detention Facility (Rodriguez, Elisa) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#5

Jun 02, 2026

MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 6/02/2026: (Text Only Entry). The Court has reviewed the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus and 2 motion for temporary restraining order. The Court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by ground one of the 1 petition. See e.g., Ramazan M. v. Andrews, No. 1:25-CV-01356-KES-SKO (HC), 2025 WL 3145562 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2025); R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, No. 1:25-CV-01535-KES-EPG (HC), 2026 WL 40507 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2026); Omer G. G. v. Kaiser, 815 F. Supp. 3d 1098 (E.D. Cal. 2025). The Court intends to rule directly on the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 2 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-CV-3118 (PMH), 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before June 5, 2026, respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that distinguish it from the Court's prior orders in Ramazan M. v. Andrews, R.A.N.O. v. Wofford, and Omer G. G. v. Kaiser and justify denying the petition, or indicate the matter is not substantively distinguishable. Pending the Court's decision, and unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the Court ORDERS that respondents shall not transfer petitioner out of this District. See F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (noting court's "express authority under the All Writs Act to issue such temporary injunctions as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction"). (Deputy Clerk VMG) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

Jun 02, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order, served on Harman-Sing Singh. (Deputy Clerk VMG)

Jun 02, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Harman-Sing Singh. (Deputy Clerk LJB)

Jun 02, 2026

RECEIPT number 100008321 for $5.00 for Petitioner from Harman-Sing Singh. (Deputy Clerk LJB)

Jun 02, 2026

Minute Order

Jun 02, 2026

Service by Mail

#6

Jun 05, 2026

Notice of Related Case

#7

Jun 05, 2026

Dismiss

#8

Jun 16, 2026

Order Reassigning Case

Jun 16, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

Jun 16, 2026

Service by Mail

Jun 17, 2026

Service by Mail

Jun 23, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys