Central District of California • 5:26-cv-03020
Abhishek None v. Fereti Semaia
Active
Case Information
Filed: June 02, 2026
Assigned to:
Rozella A. Oliver
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Active
Last Activity:
June 08, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
Jun 02, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-42439481 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner ABHISHEK NONE. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration and Exhibits) (Attorney Laxman Adhikari added to party ABHISHEK NONE(pty:pet))(Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 06/02/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening)
#2
Jun 02, 2026
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner ABHISHEK NONE. (Adhikari, Laxman) (Entered: 06/02/2026)
Main Document:
Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)
#3
Jun 02, 2026
The Petitioner has voluntarily consented to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of judgment. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mza) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026)
#4
Jun 03, 2026
Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
Main Document:
Notice of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge CV-25B optional html form
#5
Jun 03, 2026
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
Main Document:
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form
#6
Jun 03, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Main Document:
Temporary Restraining Order
Jun 03, 2026
2241 Initial Case Assignment Consent or Declination
#7
Jun 04, 2026
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: denying 6 Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO Motion"). Pursuant to General Order No. 26-05, the Court set an expedited briefing schedule for the petition for writ of habeas corpus in this case. It is not certain that the merits of the TRO Motion can be decided before the merits of the habeas petition. Even if there is a delay that results from awarding relief to Petitioner on the merits of the petition, it would be brief. Accordingly, the Court concludes that awarding relief on an expedited basis is not warranted. See Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). For these reasons, the TRO Motion is DENIED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
Jun 04, 2026
Temporary Restraining Order
Jun 08, 2026
Immigration 2241 Full Consent
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney