Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04141

#1

May 30, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Respondents by Edwin Jose Torres. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13392403) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 05/30/2026)

#2

May 30, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Edwin Jose Torres. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Juarez, Nancy) (Entered: 05/30/2026)

#3

Jun 01, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

#4

Jun 01, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Camilo Rodriguez, GOVT for Respondents. (Rodriguez, Camilo) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

#5

Jun 02, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 6/2/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. The court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count Two of the Petition. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the 1 Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order by 12:00 PM on 6/3/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 12:00 PM on 6/4/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count Two only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk CRS) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#6

Jun 02, 2026

Dismiss

Jun 02, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings

#7

Jun 15, 2026

Opposition to Motion

Jun 18, 2026

Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - 1 Terminate Deadlines and Hearings

Jun 22, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings