Western District of Pennsylvania • 3:26-cv-01009
LINARES ESCOBAR v. WARDEN
Active
Case Information
Filed: May 30, 2026
Assigned to:
J. Nicholas Ranjan
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Pretrial Detainee)
Active
Last Activity:
June 30, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 30, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $5, receipt number APAWDC-9614471), filed by ERICK ALEXANDER LINARES ESCOBAR. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tirana, Akil) (Entered: 05/30/2026)
Main Document:
ATTORNEY Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Credit Card Required)
#2
May 30, 2026
MOTION for attorney Akil Tirana to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9614475) by ERICK ALEXANDER LINARES ESCOBAR. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Proposed Order) (Tirana, Akil) (Entered: 05/30/2026)
Main Document:
Appear Pro Hac Vice (for Attorney filers only, Credit Card required)
#3
May 30, 2026
MOTION for Leave to File DVD of Bond Proceedings by ERICK ALEXANDER LINARES ESCOBAR. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Tirana, Akil) (Entered: 05/30/2026)
Main Document:
Leave to File
May 30, 2026
CLERK'S REQUEST FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION re 2 MOTION for attorney Akil Tirana to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9614475). ERROR:NO CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING ATTACHED. CORRECTION: See LCvR 83.2(B) PRO HAC VICE ADMISSIONS. A motion for admission pro hac vice CONSISTS OF MOTION, AFFADAVIT, CERTIFICATE GOOD STANDING AND PROPOSED ORDER. FILER ADVISED TO FILE A CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING USING THE ERRATA EVENT AND LINKING TO THE DOCUMENT IN QUESTION (jd)
May 30, 2026
Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (jd)
#5
Jun 02, 2026
Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
Main Document:
Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice
#6
Jun 02, 2026
Case Management Order
Main Document:
Case Management Order
Jun 02, 2026
Order on Motion for Leave to File
#12
Jun 30, 2026
ORDER denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. After reviewing the transcript from Petitioner's bond hearing held on April 14, 2026, the Court finds that the hearing was fundamentally fair. The requirements of a fundamentally fair hearing are that Petitioner: "(1) is entitled to factfinding based on a record produced before the decisionmaker and disclosed to him or her; (2) must be allowed to make arguments on his or her own behalf; and (3) has the right to an individualized determination of his [or her] interests." Ghanem v. Warden Essex Cnty. Corr. Facility, No. 21-1908, 2022 WL 574624, at *2 (3d Cir. Feb. 25, 2022) (quoting Kamara v. Att'y Gen. of U.S., 420 F.3d 202, 211 (3d Cir. 2005)). The Court finds that these requirements were met, and can otherwise discern no other flaws in the fairness of the hearing that rise to the level of a constitutional violation. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 6/30/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
#13
Jun 30, 2026
FINAL JUDGMENT, entered consistent with the above order (ECF 12). Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 6/30/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (pak) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
Jun 30, 2026
Order
Jun 30, 2026
Judgment (Rule 58)
Parties
LINARES ESCOBAR
Party
WARDEN
Party