Middle District of Florida • 2:26-cv-01810

Fernandez v. Warden, Florida Soft Side South Detention Center (Collier)

Completed

Case Information

Filed: May 29, 2026
Assigned to: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referred to: Kevin R. Huguelet
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Completed: June 17, 2026
Last Activity: June 17, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
Jun 02, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
Jun 02, 2026
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Main Document: Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#3
Jun 02, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER granting 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Huguelet on 6/2/2026. (BRH) (Entered: 06/02/2026)
Jun 02, 2026
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#4
Jun 03, 2026
Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
Main Document: Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
#5
Jun 10, 2026
Response to habeas petition
Main Document: Response to habeas petition
#6
Jun 10, 2026
Notice of appearance
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#7
Jun 10, 2026
Notice of appearance
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#8
Jun 10, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document: Dismiss
#9
Jun 15, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER denying Respondent Warden of Florida Soft Side South Detention Center's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 8). "The federal habeas statute straightforwardly provides that the proper respondent to a habeas petition is the person who has custody over the petitioner." Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004) (cleaned up). While courts have recognized that immigration detainees in state-run facilities can bring habeas claims against certain federal officials, see, e.g., Masingene v. Martin, 424 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2020), the immediate custodian is also a proper respondent. As the immediate custodian of the petitioner, the Warden is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/15/2026. (SAP) (Entered: 06/15/2026)
Jun 15, 2026
Order on Motion to Dismiss
#10
Jun 16, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER granting Jose Montel Fernandez's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1). The Government concedes the petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing based upon the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in Hernandez Alvarez v. Warden, 175 F.4th 1258 (11th Cir. 2026). The Court orders the Respondents to bring Petitioner before an immigration judge for an individualized bond hearing within ten days of the date of this Order. The hearing must include--and the resulting order must reflect--consideration of the factors set forth in In re Guerra, 24 I. & N. Dec. 37 (BIA 2006), and the government must bear the burden of proof. If Respondents are unable to ensure Petitioner receives a bond hearing that complies with this Order within ten days, they must release him under reasonable conditions of supervision. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, enter judgment, and close the case. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/16/2026. (NMC) (Entered: 06/16/2026)
Jun 16, 2026
Opinion and order AND Order Dismissing Case
#11
Jun 17, 2026
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to this Court's Order, entered June 11, 2026, Jose Montel Fernandez's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is granted. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/17/2026 with correct attachment) (BD). Modified on 6/17/2026 to regenerate NEF (BD). (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Main Document: Judgment
#12
Jun 17, 2026
ENTERED IN ERROR *** (BD) Modified text and regenerated NEF on 6/17/2026 (BD). (Entered: 06/17/2026)
Jun 17, 2026
Judgment