Completed
Case Information
Filed: May 11, 2026
Assigned to:
James E. Simmons Jr.
Referred to:
David D. Leshner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Completed: May 28, 2026
Last Activity:
May 28, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 11, 2026
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Christopher LaRose, Markwayne Mullin (Filing fee $ 5, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed.), filed by Alvaro Matias Grosso. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Letter, # 3 Index, # 4 I - Habeas Corpus 25cv3593-JES)The new case number is 3:26-cv-3112-CAB-DDL. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case.(ggv) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
#2
May 11, 2026
FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Alvaro Matias Grosso. (ggv) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
Main Document:
Financial Affidavit - CJA 23
#3
May 11, 2026
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Alvaro Matias Grosso. (ggv) (Entered: 05/19/2026)
#4
May 21, 2026
MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr and District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr for all further proceedings. The new case number is 26-cv-3112-JES-DDL. (no document attached) (maq) (Entered: 05/21/2026)
May 21, 2026
Order of Judge Transfer
#5
May 28, 2026
ORDER: (1) Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF Nos. 1, 3 ]. Signed by District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr on 5/27/2026. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(maq) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
#6
May 28, 2026
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the petition at this time. In Petitioner's motion for TRO, he appears to ask this Court to order a stay of removal so that he cannot be removed until his application for a T-Visa is ruled upon. This relief that Petitioner seeks, however, is not proper relief to ask this Court. The issues regarding Petitioner's removal and his T-Visa application are not within the jurisdiction of this Court to decide. Thus, the relief that Petitioner seeks is not proper relief to ask this Court. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion for TRO. The case is hereby closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(maq) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document:
Judgment - Clerk
Parties
Grosso
Party
LaRose
Party