Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04083

(HC) Gabuya Ramos v. Chestnut

Completed

Case Information

Filed: May 28, 2026
Assigned to: Araceli Martinez-Olguin
Referred to:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Completed: August 07, 2026
Last Activity: August 07, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 28, 2026
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin by Gamilla Cassandran Gabuya Ramos. (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ACAEDC-13383231) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Yasrebi, Arash) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 28, 2026
MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Gamilla Cassandran Gabuya Ramos. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Exhibit)(Yasrebi, Arash) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Temporary Restraining Order
#3
May 28, 2026
IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk ED) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Immigration New Case Documents for MJ as Presider
#4
May 28, 2026
DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Sergio Albarran,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Todd Blanche,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Christopher Chestnut,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Todd M. Lyons,Jonathan Williams, GOVT for Markwayne Mullin (Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: DESIGNATION
#5
May 28, 2026
ORDER re 2 TRO signed by District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin 5/28/2026. Respondents to file a Response to the 2 TRO by 6/1/2026. Petitioner may file a reply by 6/2/2026. Respondents are PROHIBITED from deporting the Petitioner or removing her from the Eastern District of California while the 1 Habeas Petition and 2 TRO are pending. (Thomas, Julia) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Order
#6
Jun 01, 2026
Opposition to Motion
Main Document: Opposition to Motion
#7
Jun 02, 2026
REPLY by Gamilla Cassandra Gabuya Ramos re 6 Opposition to Motion,. (Yasrebi, Arash) (Entered: 06/02/2026)
Main Document: REPLY
#8
Jun 10, 2026
AMENDED DOCUMENT by Gamilla Cassandra Gabuya Ramos: Amended 7 Reply, 6 Opposition to Motion,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Yasrebi, Arash) (Entered: 06/10/2026)
Main Document: AMENDED
#9
Jul 01, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Bond Hearing Notice)(Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/01/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#10
Jul 30, 2026
STATUS REPORT by Sergio Albarran, Todd Blanche, Christopher Chestnut, Todd M. Lyons, Markwayne Mullin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Bond Order, # 2 Exhibit B-I830)(Williams, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Main Document: STATUS
#11
Jul 30, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 7/30/2026: The Court is in receipt of Respondents' status report indicating that Petitioner was released on bond. "For a habeas petition to continue to present a live controversy after the petitioner's release or deportation... there must be some remaining 'collateral consequence' that may be redressed by success on the petition." Abdala v. I.N.S., 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007). "By contrast, where the grounds for habeas relief will not redress collateral consequences, a habeas petition does not continue to present a live controversy once the petitioner is released from custody." Id. Accordingly, by 8/6/2026, Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing, whether the petition presents any collateral consequences that would be redressed by a decision on the petition, or if the petition is now moot and may be dismissed. (Text Only Entry) (Thomas, Julia) (Entered: 07/30/2026)
Jul 30, 2026
Minute Order
#12
Aug 07, 2026
MINUTE ORDER signed by District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 8/7/2026: On July 30, 2026, Respondents filed a status report indicating that Petitioner had been released from custody. Dkt. No. 10 at 1. The Court subsequently issued an order to show cause directing Petitioner to file a response by August 7, 2026 indicating if there are any "collateral consequences" that would be redressed by a decision on the petition in light of Petitioner's release. See Dkt. No. 11 ; Abdala v. I.N.S., 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007) ("For a habeas petition to continue to present a live controversy after the petitioner's release or deportation... there must be some remaining 'collateral consequence' that may be redressed by success on the petition."). Petitioner did not file a response, or other appropriate request for relief, by the deadline. Accordingly, the Court finds that no collateral consequences would be redressed by decision on the petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismisses it as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (Text Only Entry) (CASE CLOSED) (Thomas, Julia) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Aug 07, 2026
Minute Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case