Eastern District of New York • 1:26-cv-03189

#1

May 27, 2026

PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filing fee $ 5, receipt number ANYEDC-20262567, filed by Chansarath Duong. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Proposed Summons, # 4 Proposed Summons, # 5 Proposed Summons, # 6 Proposed Summons) (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#2

May 28, 2026

MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Chansarath Duong. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Declaration of Joshua E Bardavid, # 3 Exhibit Ex A DUONG, Chansarath Green Card, # 4 Exhibit Ex B DUONG, Chansarath Disposition, # 5 Exhibit Ex C DUONG, Chansarath Order of Supervision, # 6 Exhibit Ex D DUONG, Chansarath ICE Check In Sheet, # 7 Exhibit Ex E DUONG, Chansarath Electronic Case Information, # 8 Proposed Order) (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#3

May 28, 2026

This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (CV) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#4

May 28, 2026

Proposed Summons. by Chansarath Duong (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#5

May 28, 2026

Proposed Summons. by Chansarath Duong (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#6

May 28, 2026

Proposed Summons. by Chansarath Duong (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#7

May 28, 2026

Proposed Summons. by Chansarath Duong (Bardavid, Joshua) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#8

May 28, 2026

Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet

May 28, 2026

Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (CV)

May 28, 2026

ORDER. To preserve the Court's jurisdiction pending final disposition of the 1 Petition, Respondents are enjoined from moving Petitioner to a location outside this District, the Southern District of New York, or the District of New Jersey absent further order of this Court. See, e.g., Loc. 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n, AFL-CIO v. N.Y. Shipping Ass'n, Inc., 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992) ("Once the district court acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter of, and the parties to, the litigation, the All Writs Act [28 U.S.C. § 1651] authorizes a federal court to protect that jurisdiction."); Garcia-Izquierdo v. Gartner, No. 04 Civ. 7377, 2004 WL 2093515, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 17, 2004) (observing that, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, a district court "may order that a petitioner's deportation be stayed... when a stay is necessary to preserve the Court's jurisdiction of the case"); Khalil v. Joyce, No. 25 Civ. 1935, 2025 WL 750599, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2025) (barring the government from removing petitioner from the United States until the Court could address his claim); Ozturk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382 (2d Cir. 2025) (declining to stay a district court order, issued pursuant to the All Writs Act, which transferred petitioner to the district court's territorial jurisdiction, given district courts' "undeniabl[e]... inherent authority to protect [its] proceedings" (citation modified)); cf. Michael v. I.N.S., 48 F.3d 657, 661-62 (2d Cir. 1995) (holding that the All Writs Act provides a federal court of appeals reviewing a final removal order with a basis to stay removal). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to email a copy of this Order and the Petition to the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Eastern District of New York. Petitioner's counsel shall also serve a copy of the order on the USAO. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 5/28/2026. (JK)

May 28, 2026

Order to Show Cause (463)

May 28, 2026

Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (CV)

May 28, 2026

Order(Other)

May 28, 2026

Case Assigned/Reassigned

May 28, 2026

Quality Control Check - Summons

#9

Jun 01, 2026

Notice of Appearance

Jun 01, 2026

Quality Control Check - Summons

Jun 01, 2026

Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: If multiple defendants, there must me a rider attached to the summons with the name and addresses of all defendants included. Only ONE Summons with a Rider Sheet is required. Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (SG)

#10

Jun 02, 2026

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Todd Blanche, William P. Joyce, Todd M. Lyons, Raul Maldonado, Jr, Markwayne Mullin (Attachments: # 1 Declaration A, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O, # 17 Exhibit P, # 18 Exhibit Q, # 19 Exhibit R, # 20 Exhibit S, # 21 Exhibit T, # 22 Exhibit U, # 23 Exhibit V) (Megaris, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#11

Jun 02, 2026

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Todd Blanche, William P. Joyce, Todd M. Lyons, Raul Maldonado, Jr, Markwayne Mullin (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit W) (Megaris, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/02/2026)

#12

Jun 04, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#13

Jun 04, 2026

Letter confirming release from custody by Todd Blanche, William P. Joyce, Todd M. Lyons, Raul Maldonado, Jr, Markwayne Mullin (Megaris, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/04/2026)

#14

Jun 08, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

#15

Jun 08, 2026

1 - Sealed Document - to be used ONLY in conjunction with other selection AND Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal

#16

Jun 08, 2026

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Jun 08, 2026

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Respondent's 14 Response to Order to Show Cause and its attachments, ECF Nos. 14-1 and 15-1. The Court notes that ECF No. 15-1 contains only internal ICE communications and does not appear to contain any communications between Cambodian officials and Respondents regarding Petitioner. Respondents are directed to produce to the Court, on or before June 10, 2026 at 10:00 AM, any communications submitted or received by ICE (or any other U.S. government officials) to or from Cambodian officials regarding Petitioner's removal and travel documents, or, if Respondents assert no such communications exist, a declaration detailing the search efforts undertaken to locate such communications. In accordance with the Court's 12 Order, if Respondents assert that no email communications from Cambodian officials exist, Respondents shall also produce any contemporaneous notes of verbal communications between ICE and Cambodian officials.The parties' 16 Joint Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Respondents' response to the 1 Petition is due on or before June 18, 2026 at 5:00 PM, and Petitioner's reply is due on or before June 23, 2026 at 9:00 AM. On consent, the 12 Temporary Restraining Order is extended to July 2, 2026 at 12:00 AM. The Court also notes that Respondents have invoked the party presentation principle, most recently restated in Margolin v. Nat'l Ass'n of Immigr. Judges, 608 U.S. ---, 2026 WL 1463466 (U.S. May 26, 2026), for the proposition that the issue of whether the revocation of [Petitioner's] OSUP was revoked by the proper official is not properly before the Court. 14 Response at 1. The Court further notes, however, that Petitioner explicitly invoked 8 C.F.R. § 241.4(l) and § 241.13 in the 1 Petition and argued that ICE's failure to follow its own mandatory procedures violated those regulations and deprived [Petitioner] of due process. 1 Petition para. 35. Moreover, the Court notes that it has, to date, granted only emergency relief in the form of a temporary restraining order, but that substantive briefing on the underlying 1 Petition is ongoing. In their full return on the Petition, due June 18, 2026, Respondents shall address, inter alia, whether the provisions of the C.F.R. that govern revocation of Petitioner's OSUP, and that require such revocation to be executed by certain officials, were followed when a Detention and Deportation Officer signed the revocation of the OSUP and whether the revocation otherwise complied with due process. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 6/8/2026. (MM)

Jun 08, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply AND Order(Other)

#17

Jun 10, 2026

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Jun 11, 2026

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Respondents will respond to the Court's Order dated June 8, 2026 on or before June 12, 2026 at 10 AM. All other deadlines remain unchanged. Ordered by Judge Nina R. Morrison on 6/11/2026. (MM)

Jun 11, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

#18

Jun 12, 2026

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Todd Blanche, William P. Joyce, Todd M. Lyons, Raul Maldonado, Jr, Markwayne Mullin (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration) (Megaris, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#19

Jun 12, 2026

SEALED DOCUMENTS, MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal by Todd Blanche, William P. Joyce, Todd M. Lyons, Raul Maldonado, Jr, Markwayne Mullin. (Megaris, Alexandra) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#20

Jun 15, 2026

1 - Sealed Document - to be used ONLY in conjunction with other selection AND Exhibit

#21

Jun 15, 2026

Exhibit

Jun 15, 2026

Order on Motion for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal AND Order on Motion for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal

#22

Jun 18, 2026

Response to Order to Show Cause

#23

Jun 26, 2026

Order(Other)