Completed
Case Information
Filed: May 27, 2026
Assigned to:
William G. Young
Referred to:
—
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause:
28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Completed: June 04, 2026
Last Activity:
June 04, 2026
Parties:
View All Parties →
Docket Entries
#1
May 27, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number AMADC-11772111 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Danny Antonio Granados Garcia. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form, # 3 Exhibit)(Kravitz, Daniel) Modified on 5/28/2026 (MAP). (Entered: 05/27/2026)
Main Document:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#2
May 27, 2026
Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. EMERGENCY ORDER CONCERNING STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVAL. (JPM) (Entered: 05/27/2026)
Main Document:
Emergency Order Concerning Stay of Transfer or Removal
#3
May 28, 2026
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (MBM) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
#4
May 28, 2026
Judge William G. Young: ORDER CONCERNING SERVICE OF PETITION AND STAY OF TRANSFER OR REMOVALRespondents shall answer or otherwise respond to the petition no later than Thursday June 4, 2026. (MAP) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document:
Order
#5
May 28, 2026
General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (MAP) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document:
General Order 19-02
May 28, 2026
Notice of Case Assignment
#6
Jun 01, 2026
Notice of Appearance
Main Document:
Notice of Appearance
#7
Jun 03, 2026
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
Main Document:
Answer/Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241
#8
Jun 04, 2026
Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered as to Danny Antonio Granados Garcia.After a thorough, independent review, the Court concludes that bond hearing afforded the petitioner was constitutionally adequate. Accordingly, the petition is denied and the stay orders presently in effect are vacated. (MAP) (Entered: 06/04/2026)
#9
Jun 04, 2026
Order Dismissing Case
Main Document:
Order Dismissing Case
Jun 04, 2026
Order
Parties
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Party
Attorney
Attorney