District of Colorado • 1:26-cv-02339

#1

May 27, 2026

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11039394)Attorney Miriam Rose Miller added to party KAM KHAMLA(pty:pet), filed by KAM KHAMLA. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Release notification, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Order of Supervision, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Call-in letter)(Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#2

May 27, 2026

Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#3

May 27, 2026

Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eguth, ) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#4

May 28, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on May 28, 2026. Upon review of Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1, the "Petition"), which requests, inter alia, that the Court assume jurisdiction, order Petitioners immediate release, order Respondents to return Petitioner to the District of Colorado, enjoin further transfers and removal, and disclose Petitioner's current custodial location, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve Respondents with a copy of the Petition and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and overnight mail, on or before May 29, 2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter their notices of appearance. Within seven days of service, Respondents shall RESPOND to the Petition and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. In doing so, Respondents are asked to briefly address: 1.Whether the issues presented here are materially different from the issues this Court has resolved in its prior §1231 prolonged detention cases, including but not limited to Pan v. Blanche, No. 26-cv-00599-SBP, and other Zadvydas-based challenges in this District; 2.Whether noncontinuous periods of post-order detention should be aggregated when evaluating whether detention has exceeded the presumptively reasonable six-month period under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), in light of this District's decisions in Pena-Gil v. Lyons, No. 25-cv-03268-PAB-NRN, Aguilar v. Noem, No. 25-cv-03463-NYW, and Lorenzzi-Gonzales v. Lyons, No. 26-cv-00821-CYC; 3.Whether Respondents complied with the notice and informal interview requirements of 8 C.F.R. §§ 241.4(l) and 241.13(i) prior to revoking Petitioner's Order of Supervision; and 4.Whether Petitioner has failed to administratively exhaust any claims asserted in the Petition. It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge consent form (ECF No. 3) no less than seven days from the date of this Order. Respondents are hereby ENJOINED from transferring Petitioner outside the jurisdiction of the District of Colorado or removing Petitioner from the United States pending resolution of the Petition. Text Only Entry (sbplc9, ) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

#5

May 28, 2026

AFFIDAVIT /RETURN of Service of Petition for Habeas Corpus upon Attorney General for District of Colorado on 05/28/2026 by Petitioner Kam Khamla. (Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 05/28/2026)

May 28, 2026

Order

#6

Jun 01, 2026

NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nicholas Albert Deuschle on behalf of Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Markwayne Mullin, US Department of Homeland Security, George ValdezAttorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Juan Baltasar(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Executive Office for Immigration Review(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party US Department of Homeland Security(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party George Valdez(pty:res) (Deuschle, Nicholas) (Entered: 06/01/2026)

#7

Jun 03, 2026

CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Kam Khamla All parties consent.. (Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

#8

Jun 03, 2026

ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and 7 Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, who will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/03/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan) (Entered: 06/03/2026)

#9

Jun 03, 2026

Order

Jun 03, 2026

Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge

#10

Jun 04, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on June 4, 2026. In its Motion to Discharge Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 9 ("Motion"), Respondents argue that this court lacks jurisdiction over this case for multiple reasons. While the Petition alludes to arguments that may be responsive to this point, the court deems it appropriate to allow Petitioner to make a full response to the 9 Motion and to explain why this court may exercise jurisdiction in this matter. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before June 11, 2026, Petitioner shall file a response to the 9 Motion. Text Only Entry (sbplc10) (Entered: 06/04/2026)

Jun 04, 2026

Order

#11

Jun 11, 2026

RESPONSE to 9 MOTION for Order to Discharge Order to Show Cause PETITIONERS RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO DISCHARGE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Petitioner Kam Khamla. (Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 06/11/2026)

#12

Jun 12, 2026

STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Respondents Juan Baltasar, Todd Blanche, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Markwayne Mullin, US Department of Homeland Security, George Valdez, Petitioner Kam Khamla. (Miller, Miriam) (Entered: 06/12/2026)

#13

Jun 23, 2026

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 06/23/2026. Petitioner has filed a 12 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal dismissing his 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice. Because Respondents have signed on, the Stipulation is self-executing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Discharge Order to Show Cause is GRANTED. Further, the Clerk's Office is asked to close this case. The parties shall bear their own costs and fees. Text Only Entry(sjeff) (Entered: 06/23/2026)

#14

Jun 23, 2026

ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to ORDER at ECF No. 13 by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 06/23/2026. Text Only Entry (sjeff) (Entered: 06/23/2026)

Jun 23, 2026

Order on Motion for Order

Jun 23, 2026

Order Dismissing Case