Middle District of Florida • 2:26-cv-01761

Escobia Martinez v. Warden, South Florida Detention Facility

Completed

Case Information

Filed: May 26, 2026
Assigned to: Sheri Polster Chappell
Referred to: Kevin R. Huguelet
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Completed: June 16, 2026
Last Activity: June 16, 2026
Parties: View All Parties →

Docket Entries

#1
May 26, 2026
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal filed by Bernardo Escobia Martinez. 1 service copy provided. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Mailing Envelope)(LAW) (Entered: 05/27/2026)
Main Document: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
#2
May 27, 2026
Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Main Document: Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#3
May 27, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER granting 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Huguelet on 5/27/2026. (BRH) (Entered: 05/27/2026)
May 27, 2026
Order on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
#4
May 28, 2026
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. The Clerk is directed to serve the petition. The Petitioner has 3 days to reply to the response to petition. Response to petition due by 6/4/2026. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 5/28/2026. (TDC) (Entered: 05/28/2026)
Main Document: Order to Respond to Habeas Petition
#5
Jun 04, 2026
Notice of appearance
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#6
Jun 04, 2026
Notice of appearance
Main Document: Notice of appearance
#7
Jun 04, 2026
Response to habeas petition
Main Document: Response to habeas petition
#8
Jun 04, 2026
Dismiss
Main Document: Dismiss
#9
Jun 05, 2026
ENDORSED ORDER denying Respondent Warden of South Florida Detention Facility's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 8). "The federal habeas statute straightforwardly provides that the proper respondent to a habeas petition is the person who has custody over the petitioner." Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004) (cleaned up). While courts have recognized that immigration detainees in state-run facilities can bring habeas claims against certain federal officials, see, e.g., Masingene v. Martin, 424 F. Supp. 3d 1298, 1301 (S.D. Fla. 2020), the immediate custodian is also a proper respondent. As the immediate custodian of the petitioner, the Warden is a proper respondent to his habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 6/5/2026. (SAP) (Entered: 06/05/2026)
#10
Jun 05, 2026
Supplement
Main Document: Supplement
#11
Jun 05, 2026
Supplement
Main Document: Supplement
Jun 05, 2026
Order on Motion to Dismiss
#12
Jun 10, 2026
Opinion and order
Main Document: Opinion and order
#13
Jun 12, 2026
Miscellaneous Relief
Main Document: Miscellaneous Relief
#14
Jun 16, 2026
Opinion and order
Main Document: Opinion and order
#15
Jun 16, 2026
Judgment
Main Document: Judgment

Parties

Escobia Martinez
Party
Warden, South Florida Detention Facility
Party