Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-04010

#1

May 26, 2026

2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Current or Acting United States Attorney General, Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Warden, Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security by Jose Santos Rodriguez Santibanez. (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#2

May 26, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Jose Santos Rodriguez Santibanez. (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#3

May 27, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk LJB) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#4

May 27, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Current or Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Sean Davis, GOVT for Current or Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement,Sean Davis, GOVT for Current or Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security,Sean Davis, GOVT for Current or Acting United States Attorney General,Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#5

May 27, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 5/27/2026: The Court has reviewed Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1 ) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 2 ). The issues raised in the Petition appear to mirror those previously addressed by the Court in many prior cases. See Morillo v. Albarran, No. 1:25-cv-01533-DJC-AC; see also E.L.D.M. v Becerra, No. 1:25-cv-01906-DJC-JDP. The Court intends to rule directly on the 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus, with the understanding that the Court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the 1 motion for temporary restraining order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); Dzhabrailov v. Decker, No. 20-cv-03118-PMH, 2020 WL 2731966, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. May 26, 2020) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). On or before June 1, 2026, Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that render it distinguishable from the Court's prior orders listed above and justify denying the petition, or indicate this matter is not substantively distinguishable. This matter is not set for a hearing though the Court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. [TEXT ONLY ORDER] (Deputy Clerk GJM) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

May 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Jose Santos Rodriguez Santibanez. (Deputy Clerk GJM)

May 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Jose Santos Rodriguez Santibanez. (Deputy Clerk LJB)

May 27, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

May 27, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Jun 10, 2026

Order on Motion for TRO

#8

Jun 10, 2026

Judgment

Jun 10, 2026

Service by Mail