Eastern District of California • 1:26-cv-03969

#1

May 26, 2026

PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Warden, California City Correctional Center by Guillermo Camacho Aguirre. [$5 filing fee received on 05/26/2026. Receipt to be docketed on 5/27/2026] (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#2

May 26, 2026

MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Guillermo Camacho Aguirre. (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

May 26, 2026

RECEIPT number 200019168 for $5.00 Habeas Filing Fee. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

#3

May 27, 2026

IMMIGRATION NEW CASE DOCUMENTS (Deputy Clerk AKP) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#4

May 27, 2026

DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Sean Davis, GOVT for Warden, California City Correctional Center (Davis, Sean) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

#5

May 27, 2026

MINUTE ORDER issued by Relief Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Dena M. Coggins on 5/27/2026: The court has reviewed Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. In that Motion, Petitioner states s/he was detained on 8/20/2025, over nine months before filing that Motion. Petitioner does not explain why he did not seek injunctive relief sooner. Notably, Local Rule 231(b) states: "In considering a motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court will consider whether the applicant could have sought relief by motion for preliminary injunction at an earlier date without the necessity for seeking last-minute relief by motion for temporary restraining order." Because Petitioner's 2 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is untimely, the court will CONVERT that Motion to a 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further, the court has previously addressed the legal issues raised by Count One of the 1 Petition. See e.g., Alvarez Maciel v. Noem, No. 1:26-cv-01318-DC-CKD, 2026 WL 496948 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2026), and Barajas Ortiz v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-01167-DC-SCR, 2026 WL 508419 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2026). The court is contemplating ruling directly on the Petition, with the understanding that the court will also consider any arguments made and exhibits submitted in support of the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(2) ("Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction, the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with the hearing."); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243 ("The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of [a petitioner's habeas petition] as law and justice require."); A.R. v. Chestnut, No. 1:26-cv-00551-KES-SAB, 2026 WL 227112, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2026) (considering preliminary injunction and merits of habeas petition simultaneously). Respondents shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12:00 PM on 6/1/2026. In their response, Respondents shall substantively address whether there are any factual or legal issues in this case that materially distinguish it from the court's prior orders listed above. Petitioner may file a Reply by 6/15/2026. Both parties should address whether they oppose the court ruling directly on the Petition, albeit as to Count One only, to the extent a ruling on that Count entitles Petitioner to the relief sought in the Petition. The matter is not set for a hearing though the court may set one should it later be determined that a hearing is necessary. (Text Only Entry) (Deputy Clerk MCF) (Entered: 05/27/2026)

May 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Minute Order served on Guillermo Camacho Aguirre. (Deputy Clerk MCF)

May 27, 2026

SERVICE BY MAIL: 3 Immigration New Case Documents served on Guillermo Camacho Aguirre. (Deputy Clerk AKP)

May 27, 2026

Minute Order AND ~Util - 1 Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

May 27, 2026

Service by Mail

#7

Jun 09, 2026

Order AND Order on Motion for TRO AND ~Util - Terminate Civil Case

#8

Jun 09, 2026

Judgment

Jun 09, 2026

Service by Mail